Share

Same Old White Guys Run the Debates

by: Marie Cocco  |  Truthdig

photo
The presidential debates to be broadcast this fall will have three white men in charge of questioning Republican John McCAin and Democrat Barack Obama. These men include Bob Schieffer (pictured), the host of CBS' "Face the Nation," Jim Lehrer, executive editor of "The NewsHour" on PBS and Tom Brokaw of NBC. (Photo: Peter Kramer / AP)

    A presidential campaign in which a prevailing theme is "change" makes it all the easier to see just how much things remain the same.

    Take the presidential debates to be broadcast this fall. The Commission on Presidential Debates plans three events, as usual, with one a "town hall" format featuring questions from voters, a recent custom on its way to becoming routine.

    Another tradition is firmly upheld as well: Three white men will be in charge of questioning Republican John McCain and Democrat Barack Obama on behalf of millions of American voters who, as a group, are less white and male than ever before. Gwen Ifill, an African-American who is moderator and managing editor of PBS' "Washington Week," drew the No. 2 spot. She will moderate the vice-presidential debate, as she did in 2004.

    I have nothing against Jim Lehrer, executive editor of "The NewsHour" on PBS, or Tom Brokaw of NBC, or Bob Schieffer, the host of CBS' "Face the Nation." But how about a dose of reality? Race and sex already have become flashpoints in this campaign. McCain's age is an issue and Obama is sparking enormous enthusiasm among younger voters. So why are we stuck in a media rut with three white men, the youngest of whom, Brokaw, is 68?

    Including the vice presidential moderator, "We chose four people who we thought were qualified," says Janet Brown, the commission's executive director. "That doesn't mean others are not."

    Brown said the panel's research into voter preferences led it to conclude that a single moderator, rather than a panel of questioners, makes the best format. There also is a preference for moderators with live television experience. As for the vice presidential debate being assigned to the sole female and person of color, Brown said the commission does not consider the job to be a lesser assignment. "Gwen is not seen as being any less important a moderator or having less important an assignment than any other moderator."

    Using the commission's criteria, it's pretty darned simple to come up with the names of television correspondents who are experienced in the issues and have the requisite live coverage credentials. Katie Couric, the CBS News anchor, is one. Christiane Amanpour, the CNN correspondent who has reported live from dangerous conflict zones for two decades, is another. Andrea Mitchell of NBC also would fit the profile.

    Brown said the panel avoids naming network anchors as moderators because "they are such celebrities." It's awfully hard to see how Couric could be considered more famous than Brokaw, who, with his best-selling books and other projects, sometimes seems like a one-man industry. But never mind. The point is that the commission looked around and what did it see? The same old picture.

    Since the commission began running debates in 1988, only one female correspondent, Carole Simpson of ABC, has moderated a presidential forum. That was in 1992 and the format was a "town hall" meeting in which Simpson's role was to facilitate questions from the audience, not ask them herself. Before his retirement, CNN's Bernie Shaw moderated both a presidential and a vice presidential debate. Simpson, Shaw and Ifill are the only African-Americans who've had such high-profile roles.

    "Truth be told, even I would say there are not a lot of women on the level of the Brokaws and the Schieffers," says Carol Jenkins, president of the Women's Media Center. "It's the networks that are so thin on women and people of color." The center is petitioning the debate commission to add more representative moderators to this year's lineup, not to eliminate a moderator who already has been announced. But Brown said that's not likely because of the single-moderator format.

    Would more women, African-Americans, Hispanics or those of other ethnic backgrounds ask the presidential contenders dramatically different questions? Perhaps not. Once a campaign settles into the stretch, the issues that are dominating public discussion inevitably dominate the debates. Just once, though, I'd like to see the candidates pressed on how changes they propose to Social Security would affect women - the group most dependent on the program and most vulnerable to changes in it. I'd like not just to hear about our future military posture in Iraq, but about America's responsibility to the millions of refugees the war has created.

    There is value in pursuing the same issues from a different perspective. But it seems that this year we are destined again to see them through the same lens.

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum. Β It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

Not only that, but the

Not only that, but the topics of the debate are likely to be uninformative on the subjects that matter for the future. The campaigns are studiously avoiding the call for a science and technology debate. Please, let's have no more religion debates. We really need the questioners to take the candidates to task if they say something that is contrary to known facts.

Would love to see Amanpour

Would love to see Amanpour handle the presidential candidates, or Ifil. Couric isn't capable of monitoring,or asking questions of, Chihuahuas with credibility. Too bad Ed Bradley isn't around.

This article is ridiculous.

This article is ridiculous. Who cares about the moderator. The real issue here is who will be let into the debates. They're letting only the coporate sell-outs in: Obama & McCain. They're excluding McKinney (psst: she's a black woman) and Nader/Gonzalez (psst: an Arab-American and a Mexican-American), the candidates who represent the majority of people who are cowed into voting for the major parties which represent only the corporations. What to do? Call Obama HQ (866-675-2008 (x6)) and tell his campaign that he must break out of the CPD box and agree to attend independently organized debates (like the Google one and the veterans one). Next call the CPD ((202) 872-1020) and tell them they must open the debates to candidates under the 15% threshold but who the people want to see in the debates, according to polls.

Well, why can't the old-grey

Well, why can't the old-grey eminences solicit questions from the public? In this day of public use of electronic communications, such question gathering should not be too difficult. Not unless the big media don't care what the public wants asked and answered.

Why do they need a

Why do they need a "moderator" for in the first place? Did Lincoln and Douglas use a moderator? No; they just went right at each other, head to head. Moderators as usually/always senior journalists - that is, people with lots of experience kissing up to their Republican bosses. They skew the debates against the Democratic candidate. This will be particularly the case this year, since McCain is the most popular candidate among journalists since Ronald Reagan.

"This article is ridiculous.

"This article is ridiculous. Who cares about the moderator.?" Everyone on Earth that's NOT an old white guy. An exaggeration..but you get the point.

What concerns me is that

What concerns me is that many white Americans are not willing to admit that the world they live in is very different from the realities that dominate the worlds of the minorities in America. This whole issue is about who gets to participate, and what the debate commission has said is that these old white guys are the only ones worthy of moderating debates at the presidential level. As well, in this case, white Americans (debate commissioners) choose other white Americans because they are frankly more comfortable with those that look like them. More than any other consideration, race or racism explains not only the commissions decision to choose only white moderators at the presidential level, but also explicates the more than 50% unemployment rate among African Americans, who have been made to weather the storm of an actual depression for many decades, a depression whose basis is the racist decision-making tendencies of many white Americans.

McCain broke his own

McCain broke his own campaign finance law, and the FEC is worse than useless. It did not one thing about it. If Obama studies how Ron Paul got McCain, despite being given a bad earpiece and no time, he will probably do well. I don't think they can give McCain 45 minutes and Obama 30 seconds. It would be too obvious.

When the debates were still

When the debates were still actually debates, they were run by the League of Women Voters. Not many older white guys there

Schieffer should have

Schieffer should have recused himself as a former business partner of G. W. Bush, but instead he handed him the religion question and let him spout allegations of his pseudo-Christian beliefs, which he has shown in practice he does NOT believe. That set-up will likely be repeated to favor the President Select, McSame. Since McCain is likely to be another 'acting' President, like Bush and Reagan, with the strings pulled by that same gang of violent extremists, Schieffer should recuse himself this time too. McCain didn't even have money to put gas in the bus during the primaries. Suddenly he was flush with money from oil men and the Public Relations men of dictators, and ALL, not SOME, ALL his competitors disappeared. The incurious Schieffer and Brokaw (and Leher?) have not noticed, apparently, or have not felt the phenomenon newsworthy. Ifill conducted herself with a calm rationality and objectivity that impressed me last time, quite a contrast to the others. I fear that between the media willingly serving up the fascists' propaganda, the pre-programmed Diebold voting machines, and the incurious media and opposition parties, we're in for four more years of assault on representative Constitutional democracy. It is not likely this nation, or any nation, can stand under such powerful and unrelenting onslaught without a free press to inform the public, and a free Congress and electorate. The ones now extant seem captive and fearful, with many running from the sinister threats of the fascists, leaving office in both parties rather than bend to the fascists' will or stay to resist and suffer the fascists' wrath. Moderators asking the questions real Americans have on their minds could do much to put real leadership in office, but I fear this lopsided group will collaborate more than confront.

These guys would ask the

These guys would ask the same lame questions supporting the same arrogant, misleading assumptions as they watch the country burn as they have for the past 20 years. Dead souled, white suburbia at its worst. Jim Leher is the most stupifying intellectual coward in the U.S. At least the fascists and theocrats on Fox are real.

I read this article

I read this article expecting an endorsement of a return to having the League of Women Voters organize the debates instead of the wholly owned instrument of the Republicans and Democrats that organizes them now. It stunts the thinking of our populace and limits the possibilities for positive change when Ralph Nader, Cynthia McKinney and Bob Barr are not included. America is headed down a path of misguided militarism and imperialism. Economically we are headed for real disaster because of wrong headed policies that favored profits and the big corporations over the American worker - policies of union busting and globalization with no environmental or labor protections. If we are going to have a bright future we need to consider the ideas of all the candidates, not just those of the two parties who have gotten us into this mess.

This is a ridiculous story!

This is a ridiculous story! First of all, Gwen Ifel, a black woman is moderating. She is from PBS, and I am sure that Senator Obama had something to do with that. Second of all, the fact that both ABC and FOX have been "frozen out" of the debates completely, I am sure at the behest of the Obama team, left them with few moderators left to quibble about. The fact that Obama did not get stuck with the "light-weight," Katie Couric, who tried to make headlines with John and Elizabeth Edwards in her "Sixty Minutes" interview, is a coup! Obama can handle Schiefer and Brokaw just fine, no matter what Right-Wing tricks they want to play on him! With the state of the today's media as it is, Obama did just fine in this one. I for one am counting the days to see him standing next to wrinkly, old, shifty-eyed McCan't (who doesn't know up from down) answering some REAL QUESTIONS for a change (NOT GIVEN TO HIM AHEAD OF THE TIME???)