Opinion

Facebook DIGG

Savor the Moment

by: Bob Herbert  |  Visit article original @ The New York Times

photo
Friday was the 40th anniversary of the death of Robert F. Kennedy, shown here with Martin Luther King, Jr.
(Photo: JFK Library)

    Friday was the 40th anniversary of the death of Robert F. Kennedy. Had he lived, he would be 82 now.

    It's impossible to gauge the what-ifs of history. But nevertheless, I wonder what Kennedy, a complicated man with a profound sense of the moral issues at play in politics, would have made of the idea that Barack Obama has captured the Democratic Party's nomination for president.

    He might not have been surprised. Kennedy had been accused of dreaming when he said in the early 1960s that a black person could get elected president in the next 40 years.

    The fact that even a dreamer could imagine nothing shorter than a 40-year timeline gives us a glimpse of the nightmarish depths of racial oppression that people of goodwill have had to fight.

    The United States in 1968 (the same year in which the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was assassinated) was a stunningly different place from the country we know now, so different that most of today's young people would have trouble imagining it. The notion in '68 that a black person - or a woman - might have a serious shot at the presidency would have been widely viewed as lunacy.

    Thurston Clarke, in his new book about R.F.K., "The Last Campaign," tells of the time that Kennedy was touring a Ford plant in Indiana. A white assembly-line worker refused to shake the presidential candidate's hand, telling Kennedy, "Get your [expletive] nigger-loving presence out of here."

    George Wallace also ran for president in '68. He was famous for "standing in the schoolhouse door" to block the court-ordered admission of black students to the University of Alabama. Wallace's views on racial matters were unequivocal. His mantra was: "Segregation now! Segregation tomorrow! Segregation forever!"

    The winner of the election was Richard Nixon, riding the G.O.P.'s soon-to-be infamous, racially polarizing and remarkably successful Southern strategy.

    A black man president? You must be joking.

    Women in 1968 were mired in depths of misogyny that were as soul-destroying as racism. Discrimination on the basis of gender was so pervasive as to barely attract notice. Many retail stores refused to issue credit cards to married women in their own names. Employers could fire women with virtual impunity if they got married or pregnant or weren't attractive enough or turned 30.

    According to the National Organization for Women, in a statement of purpose issued in 1966, fewer than 1 percent of all federal judges were women, fewer than 4 percent of all lawyers, and fewer than 7 percent of doctors.

    Racism and sexism have not taken their leave. But the fact that Barack Obama is the presumptive nominee of the Democratic Party, and that the two finalists for that prize were a black man and a white woman, are historical events of the highest importance. We should not allow ourselves to overlook the wonder of this moment.

    I was stopped on the street the other day by a woman who was holding the hand of a little girl, a toddler. After talking politics for a couple of minutes, the woman smiled and said: "Watch this." She then looked at her daughter and, referring to a certain presidential candidate, asked: "What's her name?"

    The little girl beamed and said: "Hil-la-ry!"

    That same night a middle-aged black man came to my apartment door with a food delivery. I'd seen him before, but he'd never said much, just sort of grunted a hello and a thank you. This time, after handing me the package and counting out change, he asked, shyly: "Did Mr. Obama win the nomination?"

    "Yes," I said. "He won."

    "For sure?"

    I said yes, and suddenly the widest grin spread across the delivery man's face. It was as though he'd been holding that grin in some hidden depth of emotional reserve for the entire campaign.

    This election year has been a testament to the many long decades of work and sacrifice by men and women - some famous, most not; some still alive, many gone - to build a more equitable and just American society.

    When the night riders were fitted for their robes, when Wallace stood in the schoolhouse door, when lowlifes mocked and humiliated those who were fighting for women's rights, they were trying to forestall the realization of this type of moment in history.

    We'll see whether Senator Obama gets elected president. But whether he does or not, this is a moment of which Americans can be proud, a moment the society can build upon.

    So a victory lap is in order. Not for Senator Obama (he still has a way to go), but for all those in every station in life who ever refused to submit quietly to hatred and oppression. They led us to a better place.

»


IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107, THIS MATERIAL IS DISTRIBUTED WITHOUT PROFIT TO THOSE WHO HAVE EXPRESSED A PRIOR INTEREST IN RECEIVING THE INCLUDED INFORMATION FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES. TRUTHOUT HAS NO AFFILIATION WHATSOEVER WITH THE ORIGINATOR OF THIS ARTICLE NOR IS TRUTHOUT ENDORSED OR SPONSORED BY THE ORIGINATOR.

"VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS ARE PROVIDED AS A CONVENIENCE TO OUR READERS AND ALLOW FOR VERIFICATION OF AUTHENTICITY. HOWEVER, AS ORIGINATING PAGES ARE OFTEN UPDATED BY THEIR ORIGINATING HOST SITES, THE VERSIONS POSTED ON TO MAY NOT MATCH THE VERSIONS OUR READERS VIEW WHEN CLICKING THE "VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS.

Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

His victory is certainly

His victory is certainly something to celebrate. It heralds the end of the era in which "racism" was an accepted excuse for black failure. If a black can represent one of the two established parties in a presidential election, what can blacks not accomplish? If he goes on to become POTUS, he does so because a majority of the electorate (2000 election notwithstanding) deemed him worthy of the office. The end of the era of misplaced white guilt and black grievance. Could it really happen? Only time will tell.

To minimize racism as an

To minimize racism as an "excuse" is a little insulting to say the least. While a black man even just getting the nomination for his party is HUGE in this context, it is just one small step in moving forward. Racism is one of the Institutions on which American Society was built - it is a system of terrorism, intimidation, economic/social/spiritual discrimination that is both obvious and subtle. Yes, we've made strides forward over the last 40 years, but when matched against the 400 years of apartheid that came before it - you realize that we have WAY farther to go. It is a system that affects the oppressor as well as the oppressed, and until we, as a society, sit down and take an honest, factual look at what racism has done, is doing, and may do, then all this is just window dressing.

As an added comment to

As an added comment to illustrate, I remember when Obama (who was not trying to make race the issue) was making his speech in response to the first Jeremiah Wright controversy. It was a great response and moment, and while I was sitting there admiring it, the CNN commentator (can't remember her name) asks Wolf Blitzer "Does this now make Obama the Black Candidate?" (He said it seemed like it might). I remember thinking how crazy, ludicrous and stupefying that was : here is a man, yes he is a "Black Man" by basic description, who has an African father but has a white American mother and was raised by her parents. He is as much of white society as he is of black, and yet here is this rush to pigeon-hole him as Other, and yes I know the media is another kettle of fish. This may be ignorant or predjudicial symptoms, but they are borne out of a rascism foundation and it affects EVERYBODY, even if you don't see it (I mean, nobody would even unthinkingly say of Joe Lieberman "Do you think this makes him the Jewish Candidate?" if something came up over Israel, as if this was all he was), and if not addressed, then we will be stuck in this cycle.

I believe that this is a

I believe that this is a time to celebrate, however, there is much farther to go. It is most certainly a victory in many aspects, not just for those of African American heritage but for America as a whole. Racism is one of the threads that the fabric of this nation was woven with, and without a doubt this is a grand achievement. But the road is still very long in the quest for true equality, when a person will be judged by their convictions and quality as a human being rather than any other trivial criteria and when we as Americans can "hold these truths to be sacred & undeniable; that all men are created equal & independent,". I think that we are forgetting that with this victory the door for any minority is open and the sky truly is the limit as it should be under the American dream. It does mark a milestone in the history of the United States, but it is still just another step in the dismissing of stereo-types and bias natures. We have come along way since the days of slavery, and there is still a long way to go.

What about the entire media

What about the entire media referring to candidate Clinton as "Hillary"? Never before in the history of presidential politics has a candidate been called by their first name. Could this casual lack of respect have resulted in her narrow loss of the nomination?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.