Truthout Original
Scalia Cites False Information in Habeas Corpus Dissent
Wednesday 25 June 2008
by: Marjorie Cohn, t r u t h o u t | Perspective

Marjorie Cohn says, "Scalia bolstered his hysterical claim
that the Boumediene decision 'will almost certainly cause more Americans to
be killed' with stale information that was proven to be false a year ago."
(Photo: AP)
To bolster his argument that the Guantanamo detainees should be denied the right to prove their innocence in federal courts, Justice Antonin Scalia wrote in his dissent in Boumediene v. Bush: "At least 30 of those prisoners hitherto released from Guantanamo have returned to the battlefield." It turns out that statement is false.
According to a new report by Seton Hall Law Center for Policy and Research, "The statistic was endorsed by a Senate Minority Report issued June 26, 2007, which cites a media outlet, CNN. CNN, in turn, named the DoD [Department of Defense] as its source. The '30' number, however, was corrected in a DoD press release issued in July 2007, and a DoD document submitted to the House Foreign Relations Committee on May 20, 2008, abandons the claim entirely."
The largest possible number of detainees who could have "returned to the fight" is 12; however, the Department of Defense has no system for tracking the whereabouts of released detainees. The only one who has undisputedly taken up arms against the United States or its allies, "ISN 220," was released by political officers of the DoD against the recommendations of military officers.
Scalia bolstered his hysterical claim that the Boumediene decision "will almost certainly cause more Americans to be killed" with stale information that was proven to be false one year ago. Professor Mark Denbeaux, director of the Seton Hall Center, said, Scalia "was relying uncritically on information that originated with a party in the case before him."
The Supreme Court decided in a 5-4 decision that the Guantanamo detainees were entitled to file petitions for writ of habeas corpus to challenge their detention. More than 200 men who have been held for up to six years and have never been charged with a crime will now have their day in court. Many were snatched from their homes, picked up off the street or in airports, or sold to the US military by warlords for bounty.
Scalia, who sits on the highest court in the land, has acted as a loyal foot soldier for the executive branch of government.
--------
Marjorie Cohn is president of the National Lawyers Guild and a professor at Thomas Jefferson School of Law. She is the author of "Cowboy Republic: Six Ways the Bush Gang Has Defied the Law." Her articles are archived at www.marjoriecohn.com.


Comments
This is a moderated forum. It may take a little while for comments to go live.
Scalia is just an "old
Tue, 07/01/2008 - 19:08 — David S (not verified)Impeach every single justice
Sun, 06/29/2008 - 17:55 — Anonymous (not verified)Just look at his picture he
Sun, 06/29/2008 - 03:30 — Rickywahoo (not verified)Scalia is a reactionary
Sun, 06/29/2008 - 03:29 — Rickywahoo (not verified)The source of "facts" for
Sat, 06/28/2008 - 21:21 — Jeffry K Finer (not verified)Thank you for the story.
Sat, 06/28/2008 - 18:29 — van (not verified)@RBE IMHO, you
Sat, 06/28/2008 - 12:43 — BKD (not verified)Why end this article with
Fri, 06/27/2008 - 09:06 — Festus (not verified)Impeach.
Thu, 06/26/2008 - 13:54 — Anonymous (not verified)Scalia is the poster boy for
Thu, 06/26/2008 - 09:36 — Baffled by frightened and incompetent congress (not verified)We should be grateful that
Thu, 06/26/2008 - 07:24 — Anonymous (not verified)Scalia is cut from the same
Thu, 06/26/2008 - 03:05 — richsmith (not verified)The question is who put that
Thu, 06/26/2008 - 02:08 — Anonymous (not verified)As others have pointed out,
Thu, 06/26/2008 - 00:53 — Arthur (not verified)I agree, thank you to the
Wed, 06/25/2008 - 22:49 — Anonymous (not verified)Good reporting keeps tabs on
Wed, 06/25/2008 - 20:52 — Gabriel (not verified)I agree that Scalia is a
Wed, 06/25/2008 - 20:13 — RBE (not verified)"We have either elected a
Wed, 06/25/2008 - 20:02 — bluesdog (not verified)I keep reading ad nauseum
Wed, 06/25/2008 - 19:59 — dkm (not verified)This is what America gets
Wed, 06/25/2008 - 18:37 — wise old owl (not verified)what a stupid justice scalia
Wed, 06/25/2008 - 18:18 — Anonymous (not verified)And what does Scalia know
Wed, 06/25/2008 - 18:00 — Anonymous (not verified)It sounds stupid to point
Wed, 06/25/2008 - 17:58 — Anonymous (not verified)An Anti-Constitutional
Wed, 06/25/2008 - 17:15 — Anonymous (not verified)If Scalia does not retract
Wed, 06/25/2008 - 16:47 — Anonymous (not verified)He's a traitor. He needs to
Wed, 06/25/2008 - 16:29 — ultrabop (not verified)Term limits for Supreme
Wed, 06/25/2008 - 16:29 — Michael (not verified)Despite lip service to the
Wed, 06/25/2008 - 15:42 — Scott (not verified)Scalia needs to be removed
Wed, 06/25/2008 - 15:40 — Anonymous (not verified)And people wonder how anyone
Wed, 06/25/2008 - 15:34 — Alan Brunettin (not verified)One of the most telling
Wed, 06/25/2008 - 15:33 — Ken Haltenhoff (not verified)First, I appreciate seeing
Wed, 06/25/2008 - 15:29 — Lawrence A. Welsch (not verified)Sad but true, the democrats
Wed, 06/25/2008 - 15:28 — Anonymous (not verified)Scalia would have found
Wed, 06/25/2008 - 15:27 — William Doyle (not verified)This from a court that just
Wed, 06/25/2008 - 15:19 — alaska diva (not verified)So what if it were true?
Wed, 06/25/2008 - 15:13 — Cybernaught (not verified)It's a sad fact of the
Wed, 06/25/2008 - 15:12 — G.P. (not verified)I am sure our military would
Wed, 06/25/2008 - 14:59 — Alan Kobrin (not verified)Scalia seems oblivious to
Wed, 06/25/2008 - 14:57 — Anonymous (not verified)What will be his penalty for
Wed, 06/25/2008 - 14:56 — Anonymous (not verified)What a shock! The morally &
Wed, 06/25/2008 - 14:50 — Jeremy Flannery (not verified)High Crimes Bush and Cheney
Wed, 06/25/2008 - 14:49 — Christie (not verified)