Share

Special Comment: GOP Trademarks 9/11

by: Keith Olbermann  |  MSNBC Countdown

photo
Twin Towers seen through the Brooklyn Bridge. (Photo: David W. Dunlap / The New York Times)

    Full Transcript

     This is supposed to be a day of remembrance. Remembrance of the attack, remembrance of the national unity which followed it.

     Most important of all, remembrance of the dead.

     But 9/11 has become…… a brand name.

     A Republican campaign slogan.

     Propaganda of the lowest form.

     9/11 has become… 9/11 **with a trademark logo.**

     9/11 (**TM**) has sustained a president who long ago should have been dismissed, or impeached. It has kept him and his gang of financial and constitutional **crooks** in office without - literally - any visible means of support.

     9/11 (**TM**) has made possible the greatest sleight-of-hand in our nation's history.

     The political party in office at the time of the attacks, at the local, state and national levels, the party which **uniformly** ignored the warnings - and the presidential administration already through twenty percent of its first term and no longer wet behind the ears - have not only thus far escaped any **blame** for the malfeasance and criminal neglect that allowed the attacks to occur, but that presidency and that party, have managed to make it seem as if the **other** political party would be solely and irredeemably responsible for any similar catastrophe in the future.

     Thus, Senator McCain, were you able to accomplish a further inversion of reality at your party's nominating convention last week.

     There was the former Mayor of the City of New York - the one who took **no counter-terrorism measure** in his seven years in office between the first attack on the World Trade Center, and the second attack.

     Nothing, except to insist - despite all advice and warning - that his Emergency Command Center be moved directly **into** the World Trade Center.

     Yet there was this man, Sir - Rudolph Giuliani - quite succinctly dismissed as "A Noun, a Verb, and 9/11," and repudiated even by Republican **voters** - transformed into the keynote speaker, Senator McCain - at **your** convention.

     And his childish, squealing, braying, Tourette's-like repetition of 9/11 (**TM**), was greeted not as conclusive evidence that he is consumed by massive guilt - hard-earned guilt, in fact - but rather as some kind of political tour-de-force, an endorsement of your Vice Presidential nominee, a rookie governor - a facile and slick con artist.

     The blind endorsing the bland, to a chorus of 9/11 (**TM**), 9/11 (**TM**), 9/11 (**TM.**)

     Your ringing mindless cheer of "We've Kept You Safe Since Then"…

     While nobody asks "doesn't **then** count?"

     All of this, sadistically disrespecting the dead of New York, and Washington, and Shanksville…

     **Endorsed**, Senator McCain…

     **Exploited**, Senator McCain…

     **Trademarked,** Senator McCain… by **you.**

     And yet of course **the** exact moment in which Senator McCain's Republicans showed the nation exactly how far they have fallen from the Better Angels of Mr. **Lincoln's** Nature, came the **next** night.

     The television networks were told that the Convention would pause, early in the evening, when **children** could still be watching, for a 9/11 **Tribute**, and they were encouraged to broadcast it.

     What we got was not a tribute to the **dead** of 9/11, nor even a tribute to the responders, or the singularity of purpose we all felt.

     The Republicans gave us sociological pornography… a virtual **snuff film**.

     Years ago, responsible television networks, to the applause of the nation, and the relief of its mental health authorities, voluntarily stopped showing the most graphic of the images of the World Trade Center, except with the strongest of warnings.

     And yet, the Republicans, at their convention, having virtually seized control of the cable news operations, showed… the worst of it.

     This is **all** anyone with a conscience can show you of what the Republicans showed you.

     The actual collapse of the smoking towers.

     A fleeting image of what might have been a victim leaping to his death from a thousand feet up.

     And something new.

     From this angle, ground-level, perfectly framed, images - of the fireball created when the second plane hit the second tower.

     It was terrifying.

     After all its object **was**… to **terrify.**

     Not to commemorate, not to call for unity, not to remember the dead.

     But to terrify.

     To open again the horrible wounds, to brand the skin of this nation with the message - as hateful as the terrorists' own - that you must vote Republican or this will happen again and you will die…

     And just in case that was **not** enough, to also dishonestly and profanely **conflate** 9/11 with the 1979 **Irahn** Hostage Crisis - to stoke the flames of paranoia about **another** Middle Eastern Nation.

     This **was** a 9/11 Tribute.

     Not to the dead, nor to the unity.

     But a tribute to how valuable 9/11 has been as a political tool for the Republican Party.

     9/11… (**TM.**)

     Senator McCain, you had promised us a **clean** campaign.

     You could be Snow-White the rest of the way, Sir, yet that manipulative videotape from **your** convention should tar you always in the minds of decent Americans.

     And still, as this seventh 9/11…(**TM**)… approaches - that, Sir, is not the worst of your contributions to the utter politicizing of a day that should be sacrosanct to all of us.

     Hard to believe, but the Senator has done worse with 9/11 and the evil behind it.

     We heard it last week in Minnesota… we've heard it off and on since January…

     But Senator McCain said it most **concisely** in June.

     "Look," he said. "I know the area, I've been there, I know wars, I know how to win wars, and I know how to improve our capabilities so that we will capture Osama bin Laden - or put it this way, bring him to justice. We will do it. I know how to do it."

     Senator McCain seems to be quite serious - that he and he alone - not the CIA, nor the U-S Military, nor the current President - can capture Bin Laden.

     Thus we must take him at his word, that this is no mere ludicrous campaign boast.

     We must assume Senator McCain truly believes he is capable of doing this, and has **been** capable of doing this, since last January.

     "We will capture Osama bin Laden… we will do it. I know how to do it."

     Well then, Senator… you'd better go and **do it**… **hadn't** you?

     Because, Sir, if a man or woman in this nation, Democrat or Republican, had a clear and effective means of capturing or killing Osama Bin Laden…

     If that person had been advertising his claim, Senator… for **eight** months…

     But if that person not only refused to go to responsible authorities in government and **advise** them of this plan to catch Bin Laden, but further announced he would not even begin to **enact** this secret plan to corral the world's most hated man… until the end of **next** January…

     What would be **your** description of such an individual, Senator?

     Charlatan?

     **Do-nothing**?

     **Opportunist**?

     Senator McCain, if you have - if you have **had** - a means of capturing Osama Bin Laden, and you do not immediately **inform** some responsible authority of the full scope of that plan, you are to some degree great or small… **aiding and abetting** Osama Bin Laden.

     If you could assist in **capturing** him now, Senator McCain, but you have chosen not to… you, Sir, have helped… Osama Bin Laden… stay **free.**

     **Free** to inspire and supervise the terrorists.

     **Free** to plan or execute attacks here.

     **You**, Sir, are **blackmailing** some portion of the American electorate into voting for your party, by promising to help in the capture of Bin Laden… **only** if you are made president!

     I'd rather win an election than catch Bin Laden!

     No more cynical calculation has ever been made in this nation's history, Sir.

     If you **lose** the election, Senator, are you **not** going to tell the President-Elect?

     Are you intending to keep this a **secret** until the next election and your party's next nominee?

     Senator, as you and your Republicans shed your phony, crocodile, opportunistic tears tomorrow on 9/11 **TM**, in front of the utterly disingenuous banner "Country First"….

     The **fact** is, you have shown that it is **John McCain** first, and the country **last.**

     The **fact** is, Sir, by **holding out** on your secret plan to catch Bin Laden…

     By searing those images into our collective wounded American psyche at your nomination last week…

     Terrorists are not what you, John McCain, **fight**.

     Terrorists… are what you, John McCain, **use.**

     Good night, and good luck.

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

Well done Keith. Anyone who

Well done Keith. Anyone who supports the republican ticket in this election is either a fool or a traitor. There are NO EXCEPTIONS to this FACT.

Thank you, Keith. I am so

Thank you, Keith. I am so sick of the Repug slurs and smears and sneers in this campaign. It's a descent into Slimesville.

My father was career

My father was career military and I am a second generation West Pointer and a student of history. I think John McCain is a very dangerous and opportunistic person. Examine the quote: "I know the area. I've been there." What a naive and foolish remark. It was this sort of amateur approach that led Bush to think Afghanistan would be any easy win that he could just outsource to the local tribes. He second rated that war and now it is close to being out of hand. The biggest mistake you can make is to underestimate your opponent. "I know wars. I know how to win wars." Really? Next time you wouldn't get captured? Get a bunch of vets drunk and see how long it takes for one of them to say the exact same thing. Military personnel are taught how to fight wars, and how wars have been theoretically won in the past, but what will be done to win any given war are decisions made at a higher pay grade than pilot. Civilians shouldn't be so easily intimidated by tough talking military types and their followers. Remember how Republican Nixon said he had a "secret plan to win the war"? He didn't. Only after he withdrew forces was McCain allowed to come home. And I strongly suggest McCain is dangerous because of the way he played THE GEORGIA CARD. That's too long a story for here, but, for example, what would the reaction have been if Obama sent his wife to Georgia to check on relief efforts? Don

John McCain knows how to win

John McCain knows how to win wars? What war did he actually help win?

This is the righteous

This is the righteous indignation that we need to show these hypocrites running theRoveçSchmitt McCain Bush campaign.

Keith Olbermann stands out

Keith Olbermann stands out as the most courageous newsman of our time. I fear for his safety.

Unfortunate that we remember

Unfortunate that we remember only the American victims of September 11, 2001 and not the hundreds of thousands of men, women, and children killed by American bombs, missiles, tanks, and machine guns in Afghanistan and Iraq, and by the destruction of power generation for electricity along with the medical facilities and supplies. How can we single out one attack when our government has been bombing Iraq every day of the week on a continuous basis since 1990. It is real a crime against humanity to be bombing a country's people 365 days of the year for a period of 19 years and a commitment (according to McCain) to do so for at least another decade. The only people benefiting are the bomb makers, their shareholders, and the re-election campaigns to which they contribute their blood money.

Keith tell us how you realy

Keith tell us how you realy feel http://www.lp.org/ i have made up my mind who will get my vote

Why shouldn't they trademark

Why shouldn't they trademark 9-11? They designed and manufactured it. Three buildings falling into their own footprint is no mean feat. Training several of the "participants" on military installations. Explosions coming out of the sides of the towers, and in the basement. 9-11 was an inside job!

Keith ! Onward, and

Keith ! Onward, and remember: for those who still don't know, repetition is the essence of learning. Teach them !!

McCain scares me more than

McCain scares me more than the prospect of another terror attack. Keith is right about the Republicans and the RNC. BTW, the transcript misspelled "Iran" as "Irahn" :)

That was a shining example

That was a shining example of what journalism should and could be in this country--we need to take our country back from the right wing slide into hell.

Thank you. It is about time

Thank you. It is about time someone said the emperor has no clothes and is telling the truth about what is going on -- far too close to the early 30's in Germany. I only hope more people have the courage to speak out. This is a very important piece and hope it is widely distributed and gives other commentators a model of how it should be done.

AN ENLIGHTENED MAN IS THE

AN ENLIGHTENED MAN IS THE GOOD GENE IN THE EMBRYO OF THE SPECIES... thanx KEITH