Share

The Anti-Republican Republican Who Is Really a Republican

by: John Nichols  |  The Nation

photo
Republican presidential nominee John McCain attempted to distance himself from his party despite running on its platform. (Photo: Reuters)

    St. Paul - In the eighth year of Republican dominance of the executive branch of the federal government, after an extended period in which Republicans also controlled the legislative branch of the same federal government, the party's nominee for president told its convention, "We need to change the way government does almost everything: from the way we protect our security to the way we compete in the world economy; from the way we respond to disasters to the way we fuel our transportation network; from the way we train our workers to the way we educate our children."

    Never in recent American history has the candidate of a party seeking to maintain its hold on the presidency seen its candidate so aggressively dismiss the legacy of the incumbent commander-in-chief and his allies.

    John McCain, the man George Bush so brutally beat for the Republican nomination in 2000, accepted that nomination in 2008 by declaring himself to be at war with Bush and Bushism.

    "I fight to restore the pride and principles of our party," McCain told the Republican National Convention Thursday night. "We were elected to change Washington, and we let Washington change us. We lost the trust of the American people when some Republicans gave in to the temptations of corruption. We lost their trust when rather than reform government, both parties made it bigger. We lost their trust when instead of freeing ourselves from a dangerous dependence on foreign oil, both parties and Senator (Barack) Obama passed another corporate welfare bill for oil companies. We lost their trust, when we valued our power over our principles."

    "We're going to change that," McCain promised the delegates and alternates who had just chosen him to lead the fight to keep the White House in the hands of their party. "We're going to recover the people's trust by standing up again for the values Americans admire. The party of Lincoln, Roosevelt and Reagan is going to get back to basics."

    Of course, McCain had to say this.

    George Bush is a dramatically unpopular president, with an approval rating as low as that attained by Richard Nixon in the depths of the Watergate scandal. And the Republican party has become so riddled with corruption that, at a convention that has been graced with the presence of Newt Gingrich, Tom DeLay and others party leaders who have been forced from office under clouds of scandal, McCain felt required to announce that, "I've fought corruption, and it didn't matter if the culprits were Democrats or Republicans."

    To an even greater extent than his newly-minted running-mate, Alaskan Governor Sarah Palin - who introduced herself as a battler against crooked Republicans - McCain referenced his own record as "a maverick," declaring that, "I don't work for a party. I don't work for a special interest. I don't work for myself. I work for you."

    The whole anti-Republican Republican ruse might have succeeded, were it not for the fact that McCain's rhetoric was at odds not merely with his own voting record - 90 percent with Bush - and his own Bush-on-steroids agenda.

    Even as he was pledging to "change the way government does almost everything," the senator from Arizona announced his commitment to much, much more of the same.

    He pledged to maintain endless occupations of distant lands that empty the U.S. Treasury of precious resources that might pay for infrastructue renewal, housing and job creations initiatives for hurting Americans.

    He outlined trade and tax policies that would extend, rather than alter a failed economic status quo.

    He reintroduced flawed proposals for health care, education and entitlement reforms that Americans have wisely rejected.

    And he threatened to achieve "energy independence" by declaring:

    "We will drill..."

    "We'll drill..."

    "More drilling..."

    McCain's rhetoric was that of a liberated man declaring his independence from his party's failed president and corrupt Congresses.

    But his platform was that of Republican candidate who, for all of his talk of reform, offers the crudest continuity to a country that is crying out for change.

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

McCain will not change

McCain will not change anything, it is all just blah blah blah to get elected and then he will continue to screw America and American people especially the vets.

Well, McCain says: "We need

Well, McCain says: "We need to change the way government does almost everything: from the way we protect our security to the way we compete in the world economy; from the way we respond to disasters to the way we fuel our transportation network; from the way we train our workers to the way we educate our children." This should give Palin ample opportunity to fire people. Why she could probably spend a whole term, if not two, spreading her charm widely.

The Republicans missed their

The Republicans missed their opportunity for John McCain in 2000, I dare-say he might have been slightly better than Bush then, but not now.

I hope it is getting harder

I hope it is getting harder to fool the proletariat, so that the USA will have fewer lumpen-proletariats who think the USA needs an aristocracy to control democracy. Obama is for democracy for all --- not just the elite few.

Considering that McCain

Considering that McCain voted for Bush/Cheney policy 90% of the time in the past 8 years, his speech borders on the schizophrenic. It's fine to bark about reform now that he's the candidate, but it goes beyond the Orwellian to watch McCain shrug off his voting record and his consistent support for Bush as he trashes both the GOP and Obama. Seeing a news photo yesterday of Sarah Palin taking aim with an automatic rifle, I seriously doubt that this latest flip-flop does anything more than mask what we already know: McCain and Co. will continue to deliver the most viciously depraved kind of government this country's ever seen.

I read yesterday that, out

I read yesterday that, out of over 3500 delegates at the Republican convention, only 36 were black. Bruce Springsteen, Van Halen, Jackson Browne, John Mellencamp and now, Heart, have all come out publicly to make sure the electorate knows they do not support the Republican party candidates.

Republicans talk a good game every four years, but it’s all pretend. Pretend change is coming, pretend popular musicians like you, pretend you are an all-inclusive party. And when you realize no one believes your tired, cynical rhetoric anymore, bring in Karl Rove to brow-beat people with innuendo, half-truths and downright lies that threaten their deeply-held beliefs and distract them from all the pretending. It’s sad, because there are decent Republicans, too. But they don’t control their party anymore and John McCain is just pretending he will change that.

What I want to know is how

What I want to know is how does a cadet who graduated 5th from the bottom of his class get to pilot fighter jets in a serious war? And I heard he was a hot dog who crashed more than just a few. Also, is he still fighting the Vietnam War?

This campaign platform

This campaign platform strategy seems actually crazy enough for McSame to win. Americans are so stupid and easily manipulated that apparently they don't even notice the schizoid irrationality of a Republican candidate running AGAINST his own party as a Republican candidate. We are all down the rabbit hole, folks. Nothing anymore is as it seems to be. America is caught up in a mass delusion and epidemic of madness similar to that of Germany during Hitler's rise. Things go, as Shakespeare warned, from strange to stranger.

How can a Republican

How can a Republican presidential candidate who has been in the senate for a quarter of a century ask straight faced for the public to elect him for "change," when his party has been in control of the presidency for eight years and congress for seven of those eight years? We do need change, but the Republicans should not convince the public that change means more of the same.

What can I say? He's a

What can I say? He's a leopard and he's got spots. He also changes positions faster than a couple in a porno movie, and when you think about it this convention was obscene.

Back in 2000 McCain used to

Back in 2000 McCain used to seem like a decent guy with an independent streak. He actually supported things like Campaign Finance Reform that the Republicans hated. He called Falwell and Roberts on their BS. He had a lot of support from independents and even some democrats. That was then and this is now. The lesson he seems to have taken away from that period is that the way to get elected is to march in lockstep with the biggest cretin ever to occupy the whitehouse. Aside from that, it looks like he made some sort of deal with the devil to support Bush in 2000 and beyond if Bush would support him when the time came. That may explain why he's voiced no criticism of this administration for the last eight years and consistently supported Bush policies. He's a bit better than those other guys running in the GOP primary, such as Giuliana & Romney, but that's not saying much since those guys were creeps.

The American electorate was

The American electorate was not fooled in 2000 or 2004. Those elections were stolen. (Read Greg Palast's books.) I believe the majority will not be fooled again. But majority does not rule an election, the electoral college does. We must work hard in every state, especially Florida, Pennsylvania, Virginia, North Dakota, and Montana. And we MUST protest election irregularities. The future of this country is at stake.

The above poster is correct,

The above poster is correct, most of the American people are to stupid to know what is happening to their country, and why. It's much easier to sit on their #ss and watch the filtered news, along with the swiftboating, and then profess to know how to vote

McCain and Palin's

McCain and Palin's descriptions were described by the press as "misrepresentations." I would prefer to call them what they are...lies. McCain can't claim ignorance. Now if the Rove/Schmidt tactics are ever to stop, someone has to bring consequences to bear. One way to do that would be for the press to just say, "The candidate lied about x." Call it what it is...

McCain's military assignment

McCain's military assignment was to fly bombing runs, raining death and large scale destruction indiscriminately on foes and civilians alike. He wasn't a fighter pilot in the accepted sense of engaging the enemy one-on-one.

Americans are not stupid. It

Americans are not stupid. It was 1970 when I first discovered it was easier to train humans with a TV than it is to train a dog with snacks and love. There is no shame in being Human. Shame is a plague on those who so skillfully use the tricks of Machiavelli, Hitler and Stalin to manipulate humans. Constructive change means designing a sustainable culture that can economically prosper as population and economic activity shrink to sustainable levels. Cordially, Garrett

McCain is so inspirational.

McCain is so inspirational. He should give this speech- because obviously running our country on oil is of life and death importance- otherwise we wouldn't be in Iraq, right? So, yeah, how about it, John? You get your ideas from corporate oil barons, maybe you could plagiarize history for inspirational speeches: "We shall go on to the end, we shall drill in Iraq, we shall drill on the seas and oceans, we shall drill with growing confidence and growing strength in the air, we shall defend our Island, whatever the cost may be, we shall drill on the beaches, we shall drill on the landing grounds, we shall drill in the fields and in the streets, we shall drill in the hills; we shall never surrender, and even if, which I do not for a moment believe, this nation or a large part of it were subjugated and starving, we would never consider for a moment giving up our God-given right to drive SUVs"

"We lost their trust when

"We lost their trust when rather than reform government, both parties made it bigger." Might those two parties be the "Rupublicons" and the "Republican'ts"?

Senator McCain and his

Senator McCain and his cohort did what politicions do. They said all the things to maximize the applause from a friendly and biased audience. What was said by them including the slanderous remarks merely exposes them as the phonies that they are. Their records speak for themselves.