Truthout Original

Jobless Rate Soars to 6.1 Percent, 84,000 Jobs Lost

by: Dean Baker, t r u t h o u t | Report

photo
Job seekers attending a job fair in New York face greater competition, with the US losing 84,000 jobs in August alone. (Photo: AP)

The labor market is as weak or weaker than at the worst points of the last recession.

    The unemployment rate jumped to 6.1 percent in August, the highest level since September of 2003. The establishment survey showed the economy losing another 84,000 jobs in August. With downward revisions to data for the prior two months, the economy has lost an average of 81,000 jobs over the last three months.

    Virtually all the data in the household survey indicates that the labor market is weakening at a rapid pace. The 6.1 percent unemployment rate is only 0.2 percentage points below the 6.3 percent peak reached in June of 2003. The employment to population ratio (EPOP) ratio fell to 62.1 percent, only slightly above the 62.0 percent low hit in September of 2003.

    Unemployment rose among almost all demographic groups, but women were hit hardest, with a rise of 0.7 pp to 5.3 percent. This is equal to the high for the last downturn in September of 2003. Black women saw their unemployment rate jump by 1.6 percentage points to 9.1 percent. The unemployment rate for blacks overall rose by 0.9 pp to 10.6 percent. The unemployment rate for Hispanics jumped by 0.6 pp to 8.0 percent, the highest level since reaching 8.1 percent in July of 2003.

    Workers at all educational levels had an increase in their unemployment rates. Workers without high school degrees had the largest rise, with their unemployment rate going up 1.1 pp to 9.6 percent, the highest level since October of 1994.

    There continues to be sharp differences in employment experiences by age group, with older workers staying in the work force in much greater numbers. Over the last year, employment among people over age 55 has risen by 1,046,000. For people under age 55, employment has dropped by 1,322,000. The biggest decline has been for people between the ages of 35 and 44, who saw employment drop by 932,000 or 2.7 percent. Employment among men in this age group fell by 554,000 or 3.0 percent.

    Other data in the household series also indicate labor market weakness. The number of involuntary part-time workers increased by another 42,000 and now stands almost 1.8 million above the low hit in April of 2006. U-6, the Labor Department's broadest measure of labor market slack, rose to 10.7 percent. This is higher than at any point in the last downturn and the highest level since July of 1994.

    The establishment data indicate that the rate of job loss in the private sector might be accelerating, with a loss of 101,000 jobs in August. The private sector has lost an average of 92,000 jobs over the last three months.

    While most sectors lost jobs last month, manufacturing was hardest hit with a loss of 61,000 jobs, driven by a loss of 39,000 jobs in the auto sector. Over the last year, the auto sector has lost 129,000 jobs, or 12.9 percent of total employment. Retail trade lost 19,900 jobs, driven primarily by a loss of 14,100 jobs in auto and auto parts stores.

    The employment services sector lost 53,400 jobs in August. This brings job loss in this sector since January to 279,000, 7.8 percent of employment in the sector. Since temporary employment is often a harbinger of future employment trends, this is not good news.

    The only sectors that continue to show healthy job gains are health care, which added another 26,900 jobs, and state and local governments, which added 18,000 jobs. Job growth in both of these sectors is likely to fade as state and local budget shortfalls force cutbacks.

    The wage story looks somewhat brighter for workers, with nominal wage growth accelerating to a 3.8 percent annual rate in the last three months (compared to the prior three), but this is still far below the rate of inflation.

    This report shows that the labor market is in a recessionary state. It is almost certain to worsen in the foreseeable future as employment growth in health care and government slow, while other sectors continue to have large layoffs. Also, the benchmark revisions to the establishment data, which will be published with next month's report, are likely to show an even more negative picture.

»


Dean Baker is the co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR). He is the author of "The Conservative Nanny State: How the Wealthy Use the Government to Stay Rich and Get Richer" (www.conservativenannystate.org). He also has a blog, "Beat the Press," where he discusses the media's coverage of economic issues. You can find it at the American Prospect's web site.

Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live.

39,000 jobs lost in the auto

39,000 jobs lost in the auto industry..., General Motors had a working, feasible electric car, the EV-1, in production, being leased to private citizens, because of California's mandate for zero emission vehicles. Instead of going head with it, they pushed to get the mandate rescinded, and took back and destroyed all the EV-1's. If, today, GM had a production facility for EV-1's, they'd be selling as many as they could produce with a year-long waiting list. They would be making money hand over, and the company would not be on the brink of bankruptcy. But none of the senior management has gotten punished for this: they are still getting their huge salaries. They're perfectly willing to let the company die and sent tens of thousands of workers onto the breaadlines, to lose their homes. They opted for their buddies in the oil industry as opposed to the future of their own company. This is not capitalism: this is a degenerate aristocracy.

84K + 125-150K is a bigger

84K + 125-150K is a bigger net loss than reported. Indeed. Add to that all the people whose unemployment benefits have been exhausted and poof ... they too vanish from the unemployment figures despite still being unemployed. At least most people have figured out that cost of living figures are bogus. Employers though, still base raises on these bogus figures because they can. I don't think we are going to make it. Too much broken, too severely, for too long, to benefit too few.

I worked my way through

I worked my way through college by working full time summers and half time during the school year. That was possible in the 60's. The middle class got educated and got "protest and survive". Financing one's own education is no longer feasible. The debt thereby accumulated is for jobs that will be off-shored. (Although the USA is advertising in Canada to move their business here where desperate workers are cheaper; like the Grapes of Wrath in which a grandfather was forced to fight the even more impoverished to the benefit of the wealthy). Those in charge know the desperate in poverty and the ill-educated are easier to control. They've shown during the repubiCon infotainment just how far they are willing to stick it to us.

Another Peasant, I agree,

Another Peasant, I agree, especially the part about "You are screwed and that's the way things are going to stay." If you listen carefully they really are just shoving it in our faces. We are just a bunch of whiners, remember? This from the man who wrote the legislation that deregulated the mortgage industry which directly caused the subprime meltdown.

radline9: -who says they

radline9: -who says they want to? If they could make more money for their wealthy friends by letting us go straight to hell as a country, do you think they'd hesitate for a moment? -And you're right, gas will be down in November, but both parties are ignoring that we could be completely off of fossil fuel dependence within 5 years, max. Cover an area as big as the first nuclear test site with current technology solar panels, move to electric, and compressed-air powered cars, and we could literally cover our entire energy consumption. Then we could produce enough oil for lubrication and plastics domestically, and stop burning it. Period. It would create tons of jobs building all the new infrastructure it would entail, too. Yet nobody is talking about it on the campaign trail. Oh, and to "This goes to show...", -what do you expect from someone who only held one "regular" job in his life for a very brief period, working for his father-in-law's beer distribution business? I love the way McCain came to my home state, Michigan, and told everyone that "those good jobs aren't coming back". Great. That's some straight talk, I guess, like: "You're screwed, and that's the way it's gonna stay!" That's the kind of retarded patrician, upbeat message that the American worker needs. -And nominally Red China has been growing by leaps and bounds, even though the productivity of the American worker has usually exceeded that of the Chinese worker. Yet, they get good industrial jobs and we don't, because???... I also love how hard he worked to help the country that held him as a POW resume normal trade relations with the world so they could export their products. Does that mean that if the Michigan government had held him in prison for several years, he'd do the same for us? Just a hypothetical question, mind...

84k plus the 125k-150k

84k plus the 125k-150k needed to keep up with population growth is a net loss of 200k+.

This goes to show McCain is

This goes to show McCain is still not 'getting it'! Unemployment does not seem to be an important to McCain because he is too disconnected from the ordinary American life and the state of affairs that matter most to the American people.

The question is: Can the

The question is: Can the republicans keep the economy on life support until November? You know gas prices will come down before November.