News

US Removes Oil Giant From Burma Sanctions

»

by: Elana Schor, The Guardian UK

photo
White House, Congress exempt Chevron from sanctions imposed upon Burma. (Illustration: democracyinaction.org)

    The US oil giant Chevron will continue to do business in Burma after a provision to stop it operating there was removed from the latest round of US sanctions on the country.

    The new sanctions plan, approved yesterday by Congress and expected to receive quick approval from the White House, prevents the sale of Burmese gems and timber in the US via third parties - bringing the US into line with EU and Canadian policy. Profits from those products have enriched Burma's oppressive military regime.

    But Congress chose not to sanction Chevron, the largest US business still operating in Burma. An early version of the plan would have forced the company to give up its 28% stake in the Yadana natural gas field, which the regime considers a crucial political priority.

    Human rights advocates have linked the Yadana project to ongoing abuses by the regime, including forced labour, rapes and land confiscation to make room for the natural gas pipeline which is slated to run from Burma to Thailand.

    The requirement that Chevron leaves Burma was softened to a non-binding recommendation for divestment after the company protested. The US stake in Yadana would be handed over to Chinese or Indian companies if Chevron was forced to sell, the company argued.

    The Burma sanctions plan was proposed in Congress last year in response to the regime's bloody quashing of peaceful protests by Buddhist monks and other pro-democracy activists. Not until Cyclone Nargis caused widespread devastation in Burma in May, however, did the legislation move forward.

    Howard Berman, the Democratic chairman of the foreign affairs committee in the House of Representatives, lamented that the regime is morally bankrupt "but unfortunately is far from financially bankrupt".

    "While the Burmese people live in abject poverty, Burma's military leaders continue to take Burma's vast natural resources as their own," Berman added.

»


IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107, THIS MATERIAL IS DISTRIBUTED WITHOUT PROFIT TO THOSE WHO HAVE EXPRESSED A PRIOR INTEREST IN RECEIVING THE INCLUDED INFORMATION FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES. TRUTHOUT HAS NO AFFILIATION WHATSOEVER WITH THE ORIGINATOR OF THIS ARTICLE NOR IS TRUTHOUT ENDORSED OR SPONSORED BY THE ORIGINATOR.

"VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS ARE PROVIDED AS A CONVENIENCE TO OUR READERS AND ALLOW FOR VERIFICATION OF AUTHENTICITY. HOWEVER, AS ORIGINATING PAGES ARE OFTEN UPDATED BY THEIR ORIGINATING HOST SITES, THE VERSIONS POSTED ON TO MAY NOT MATCH THE VERSIONS OUR READERS VIEW WHEN CLICKING THE "VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS.

Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live.

Is this an indication of

Is this an indication of what Iran needs, in order to stave off a pre-emptive series of attacks?.. a serious US industrial investor?(Of course, it didn't work for Germany, where the Ford factories were bombed by the Allied Forces... but it worked for Ford, which received compensation for the damages they sustained, once the war was over.) Part of the problem with a Chevron divestment may be that they'd be liable for 'unanticipated' income- from which they haven't wangled a dispensation, yet. Give them time... ^..^

Quoting from the article,

Quoting from the article, "Howard Berman, the Democratic chairman of the foreign affairs committee in the House of Representatives, lamented that the regime is morally bankrupt "but unfortunately is far from financially bankrupt". Talking about the United States, isn't he? Again quoting, "The requirement that Chevron leaves Burma was softened to a non-binding recommendation for divestment after the company protested." How much more proof do we need to show that the United States shucked democracy, and has become thoroughly fascist? The corporation protested? Money talks, democracy walks. And then there is this gem...""While the Burmese people live in abject poverty, Burma's military leaders continue to take Burma's vast natural resources as their own," Berman added. The Burmese leaders do not understand that the vast natural resources of Myanmar (Burma) belong to US investors, not to the Burmese. In a country where [h]uman rights advocates have linked the Yadana [and therefore Chevron] project to ongoing abuses by the regime, including forced labour, rapes and land confiscation to make room for the natural gas pipeline which is slated to run from Burma to Thailand," the US, yet again, talks tough, but behaves as a coward. The United States so needs a Bolivarian revolution. Finally, this little beauty: "Not until Cyclone Nargis caused widespread devastation in Burma in May, however, did the legislation move forward." Isn't it just like a bully to kick the smaller man when he is down? To borrow from Naomi Klein, this is Disaster Legislation from the same people who brought us Disaster Capitalism, the IMF, the World Bank, and NAFTA. What a disgusting excuse for a civilized nation the US has become!

Add a comment:

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
The following question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Please enter the two words seen below. If you cannot read them you may use the button with circling arrows to get a new one.