News

White House Remains Defiant on Miers, Bolten Testimony

»

by: Susan Crabtree, The Hill

photo
Former White House officials Harriet Miers and Joshua Bolten are under subpoena for testimony in the ongoing investigation of the firing of US attorneys. (Photo: AP)

    Despite a court ruling last week rejecting its claim of executive privilege, the White House still rebuffs congressional subpoenas for chief of staff Joshua Bolten and former counsel Harriet Miers.

    The two on Thursday requested that federal District Judge John Bates stay the ruling until the case is appealed. In a letter to Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), White House counsel Fred Fielding said the administration would await the outcome of its appeal before "entertaining any requests for Mr. Bolten's compliance with the Senate Judiciary subpoena."

    Fielding also noted that any request for testimony from former White House adviser Karl Rove would produce the same response.

    Leahy had sent a letter to Fielding last week asking him to advise the committee when Bolten would comply with the subpoena in light of the judge's ruling.

    Bates, in his decision, rejected the Bush administration's claim that White House aides have blanket immunity from congressional subpoenas and ordered Miers to testify and the White House to turn over a log describing documents it withheld from Congress.

    The subpoenas sought testimony about what role, if any, senior White House officials played in the firings of nine U.S. attorneys last year, as well as the improper political hirings of attorneys and interns at the Department of Justice.

    Leahy blasted the White House's ongoing resistance to the subpoena, saying that it was yet another example of the Bush administration flouting the rule of law.

    "This continuing contempt of Congress is another example of the lengths to which this administration will go and how it uses government lawyers to protect its actions from scrutiny and increase its power, rather than respect the rule of law," he said in a statement.

»


IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107, THIS MATERIAL IS DISTRIBUTED WITHOUT PROFIT TO THOSE WHO HAVE EXPRESSED A PRIOR INTEREST IN RECEIVING THE INCLUDED INFORMATION FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES. TRUTHOUT HAS NO AFFILIATION WHATSOEVER WITH THE ORIGINATOR OF THIS ARTICLE NOR IS TRUTHOUT ENDORSED OR SPONSORED BY THE ORIGINATOR.

"VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS ARE PROVIDED AS A CONVENIENCE TO OUR READERS AND ALLOW FOR VERIFICATION OF AUTHENTICITY. HOWEVER, AS ORIGINATING PAGES ARE OFTEN UPDATED BY THEIR ORIGINATING HOST SITES, THE VERSIONS POSTED ON TO MAY NOT MATCH THE VERSIONS OUR READERS VIEW WHEN CLICKING THE "VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS.

Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live.

As attorneys, they have

As attorneys, they have flouted ethical duties that are not rights, but privileges. They both should be disbarred, immediately.

The American people are

The American people are getting quite a show. This congress has abdicated its authority and responsibility endlessly. What do they expect from this administration but disrespect. Now watch Leahy put in another request for answers to the administration about when they think Meyers and Bolton will show. The average citizen would have been behind bars long ago.

Under normal circumstances

Under normal circumstances if a citizen ignores a subpoena he or she gets arrested. What makes these felons so special? They should be charged with contempt, arrested, and then let them fight it out from their jail cells.

As long as congress lets

As long as congress lets them. No wonder they have such a low approval rating!

CONGRESS!! Use INHERENT

CONGRESS!! Use INHERENT CONTEMPT and put them IN JAIL, use some truth serum and keep them at Guantanamo.

In the face of open and and

In the face of open and and arrogant defiance of the U.S. Congress and the Constitution of the United States, what are Conyers and Pelosi waiting for to bring IMPEACHMENT before the House?

How long can they hide?

How long can they hide?

Add a comment:

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
The following question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Please enter the two words seen below. If you cannot read them you may use the button with circling arrows to get a new one.