Go to Original
White House Declines to Totally Rule Out Torture
Agency France-Presse
Sunday 13 November 2005
In an important clarification of President George W. Bush's earlier statement,
a top White House official refused to unequivocally rule out the use of torture,
arguing the US administration was duty-bound to protect Americans from terrorist
attack.
The comment, by US national security adviser Stephen Hadley, came amid heated
national debate about whether the CIA and other US intelligence agencies should
be authorized to use what is being referred to as "enhanced interrogation
techniques" to extract from terror suspects information that may help prevent
future assaults.
The US Senate voted 90-9 early last month to attach an amendment authored by
Republican Senator John McCain to a defense spending bill that would prohibit
"cruel, inhuman or degrading" treatment of detainees in US custody.
But the White House has threatened to veto the measure and has lobbied senators
to have the language removed or modified to allow an exemption for the Central
Intelligence Agency.
During a trip to Panama earlier this month, Bush said that Americans "do
not torture."
However, appearing on CNN's "Late Edition" program, Hadley elaborated
on the policy, making clear the White House could envisage circumstances, in
which the broad pledge not to torture might not apply.
"The president has said that we are going to do whatever we do in accordance
with the law," the national security adviser said. "But... you see
the dilemma. What happens if on September 7th of 2001, we had gotten one of
the hijackers and based on information associated with that arrest, believed
that within four days, there's going to be a devastating attack on the United
States?"
He insisted that it was "a difficult dilemma to know what to do in that
circumstance to both discharge our responsibility to protect the American people
from terrorist attack and follow the president's guidance of staying within
the confines of law."
The CIA is reported to be operating a network of covert prisons in eight countries
around the world, including Afghanistan, Thailand and several former Soviet
bloc nations in Eastern Europe, where terror suspects are questioned.
Republican Senator Kit Bond, a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee,
told Newsweek magazine that "enhanced interrogation techniques" had
worked with at least one captured high-level Al-Qaeda operative, Khalid Shaikh
Mohammed, to thwart an unspecified plot.
But officials have been mum about interrogation techniques used on other detainees,
drawing sharp criticism from members of the Senate.
A compromise with senators was in the works, Hadley assured, saying the White
House was holding consultations with them about the McCain amendment.
He offered no specifics about the administration's goals in these talks. But
McCain, who appeared on CBS's "Face the Nation" program, said White
House negotiators led by Vice President Richard Cheney were pushing to safeguard
the option of using the enhanced interrogation techniques in order to get information
from detainees in extraordinary circumstances.
The senator said he disagreed with that approach because he was worried about
the damage to the image of the United States.
"I hold no brief for the terrorists," he said. "But it's not
about them. It's about us. This battle we're in is about the things we stand
for and believe in and practice. And that is an observance of human rights,
no matter how terrible our adversaries may be."
Americans at large don't seem to have a clear-cut position on the use of torture.
The latest Newsweek opinion poll found that 58 percent of the public would support
torture to thwart a terrorist attack.
But the same survey showed that 51 percent of Americans believe it is rarely
or never justified, while 44 percent said torture is often or sometimes justified
to obtain important information.
-------
Jump to today's TO Features:
(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. t r u t h o u t has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is t r u t h o u t endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)
"Go to Original" links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted on TO may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the "Go to Original" links.
Print This Story
E-mail This Story