Also see:
AOL/Microsoft-Hotmail Preventing Delivery of Truthout Communications •
Go to Original
Repress U: How to Build a Homeland Security Campus in Seven Steps
By Michael Gould-Wartofsky
TomDispatch.com
Thursday 10 January 2008
Free speech zones. Taser guns. Hidden cameras. Data mining. A new security
curriculum. Private security contractors... Welcome to the new homeland security
campus
From Harvard to UCLA, the ivory tower is fast becoming the latest watchtower
in Fortress America. The terror warriors, having turned their attention to "violent
radicalization and homegrown terrorism" - as it was recently
dubbed in a House of Representatives bill of the same name - have
set out to reconquer that traditional hotbed of radicalization, the university.
Building a homeland-security campus and bringing the university to heel is
a seven-step mission:
1. Target dissidents: As the warfare state has triggered
dissent, the campus has increasingly become a target gallery - with student
protesters in the crosshairs. The government's number one target? Peace and
justice organizations.
From 2003 to 2007, an unknown number of them made it into the Pentagon's "Threat
and Local Observation Notice" system (TALON), a secretive domestic spying
program ostensibly designed to track direct "potential terrorist threats"
to the Department of Defense itself. Last year, via Freedom of Information Act
requests, the ACLU uncovered at least 186 specific TALON
reports on "anti-military protests" in the U.S. - some listed as
"credible threats" -- from student groups at the University of California-Santa
Cruz, State University of New York, Georgia State University, and New Mexico
State University, among other campuses.
At more than a dozen universities and colleges, police officers now double
as full-time FBI agents and, according to the Campus Law Enforcement
Journal, serve on many of the nation's 100 Joint Terrorism Task Forces.
These dual-purpose officer-agents have knocked on student activists' doors from
North Carolina State to the University of Colorado and, in one case, interrogated
an Iraqi-born professor at the University of Massachusetts-Amherst about his
antiwar views.
FBI agents, or their campus stand-ins, don't have to do all the work themselves.
Administrators often do it for them, setting up "free speech zones,"
which actually constrain speech, and punishing those who step outside them.
Last year, protests were typically forced into "free assembly areas"
at the University of Central Florida and Clemson University; while students
at Hampton and Pace Universities faced expulsion for handing out antiwar flyers, aka "unauthorized
materials."
2. Lock and load: Many campus police departments are morphing
into heavily armed garrisons, equipped with a wide array of weaponry from Taser
stun guns and pepper guns to shotguns and semiautomatic rifles. Lock-and-load
policies that began in the 1990s under the rubric of "the war on crime"
only escalated with the President's Global War on Terror. Each school shooting
- most recently the massacre at Virginia Tech - just adds fuel to the armament flames.
Two-thirds of universities now arm their police, according to the Justice Department.
Many of the guns being purchased were previously in the province of military
units and SWAT teams. For instance, AR-15 rifles (similar to M-16s) are now
in the arsenal of the University of Texas campus police. Last April, City University
of New York bought dozens of semiautomatic handguns. Now, states like Nevada
are even considering plans to allow university
staff to pack heat in a "special reserve officer corps."
Most of the force used on campus these days, though, comes in "less lethal"
form, such as the rubber bullets and pepper pellets increasingly used to contain
student demonstrations. Then there is the ubiquitous Taser, the electroshock
weapon recently ruled a "form of torture"
by the UN. A Taser was used by UCLA police in November 2006 to deliver shock after shock to an Iranian-American
student for failing to produce his ID at the Powell Library. Last September,
a University of Florida student was Tased after asking pointed questions of
Senator John Kerry at a public forum, his plea of "Don't Tase me, bro"
becoming the stuff of pop folklore.
3. Keep an eye (or hundreds of them) focused on campus:
Surveillance has become a boom industry nationally - one that now reaches deep
into the heart of the American campus. In fact, universities have witnessed explosive growth in the electronic
surveillance of students, faculty, and campus workers. On ever more campuses,
closed-circuit security cameras can track people's every move, often from hidden
or undisclosed locations, sometimes even into classrooms.
The International Association of Campus Law Enforcement Administrators reports
that surveillance cameras have now found their way onto at least half of all
colleges, their numbers on any given campus doubling, tripling, and in a few
cases, rising tenfold since September 11, 2001. Such cameras have proliferated by the hundreds on
private campuses, in particular. The University of Pennsylvania, for instance,
has more than 400 watching over it, while Harvard and Brown have about 200 each.
Elsewhere, it can be tricky just to find out where the cameras are and what
they're meant to be viewing. The University of Texas, for example, battled student
journalists over disclosure and ultimately kept its cameras hidden. Sometimes, though,
a camera's purpose seems obvious. Take the case of Hussein Hussein, a professor
in the Department of Animal Biotechnology at the University of Nevada, Reno.
In January 2005, the widely respected professor found a hidden camera redirected to monitor
his office.
4. Mine student records: Student records have, in recent
years, been opened up to all manner of data mining for purposes of investigation,
recruitment, or just all-purpose tracking. From 2001 to 2006, in an operation
code-named "Project Strike Back," the Department of Education teamed
up with the FBI to scour the records of the 14 million students
who applied for federal financial aid each year. The objective? "To identify
potential people of interest," explained an FBI spokesperson cryptically,
especially those linked to "potential terrorist activity."
Strike Back was quietly discontinued in June 2006, days after students at Northwestern
University blew its cover. But just one month
later, the Education Department's Commission on the Future of Higher Education,
in a much-criticized preliminary report, recommended the creation of a federal
"unit record" database that would track the activities and studies
of college students nationwide. The Department's Institute of Education Sciences
has developed a prototype for such a national database.
It's not a secret that the Pentagon, for its part, hopes to turn campuses into
recruitment centers for its overstretched, overstressed forces. In fact, the
Department of Defense (DoD) has built its own database for just this purpose.
Known as Joint Advertising Market Research and Studies, this program now tracks 30 million young people, ages
16 to 25. According to a Pentagon spokesperson, the DoD has partnered with private
marketing and data mining firms, which, in turn, sell the government reams of
information on students and other potential recruits.
5. Track foreign-born students, keep the undocumented out:
Under the auspices of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), the Department
of Homeland Security (DHS) has been keeping close tabs on foreign students
and their dependents through the Student and Exchange Visitor Information System
(SEVIS). As of October 2007, ICE reported that it was actively following 713,000
internationals on campuses, while keeping more than 4.7 million names in its
database.
The database aims to amass and record information on foreign
students throughout their stay inside the United States. SEVIS requires thick
files on the students from the sponsoring schools, constantly updated with all
academic, biographical, and employment records - all of which will be shared
with other government agencies. If students fall out of "status" at
school - or if the database thinks they have - the Compliance Enforcement
Unit of ICE goes into action.
ICE has also done its part to keep the homeland security campus purified of
those not born in the homeland. The American Immigration Law Foundation estimates
that only one in 20 undocumented immigrants who graduate high school goes on
to enroll in a college. Many don't go because they cannot afford the tuition,
but also because they have good reason to be afraid: ICE has deported
a number of those who did make it to college, some before they could graduate.
6. Take over the curriculum, the classroom, and the laboratory:
Needless to say, not every student is considered a homeland security threat.
Quite the opposite. Many students and faculty members are seen as potential
assets. To exploit these assets, the Department of Homeland Security has launched
its own curriculum under its Office of University Programs (OUP), intended,
it says, to "foster a homeland security culture within the academic community."
The record so far is impressive: DHS has doled out 439 federal fellowships and
scholarships since 2003, providing full tuition to students who fit "within
the homeland security research enterprise." Two hundred twenty-seven schools
now offer
degree or certificate programs in "homeland security," a curriculum
that encompasses over 1,800 courses. Along with OUP, some of the key players
in creating the homeland security classroom are the U.S. Northern Command (Northcom)
and the Aerospace Defense Command, co-founders of the Homeland Security and Defense Education
Consortium.
OUP has also partnered with researchers and laboratories to "align scientific
results with homeland security priorities." In Fiscal Year 2008 alone,
$4.9 billion in federal funding will go to homeland security-related research.
Grants correspond with 16 research topics selected by DHS, based
on presidential directives, legislation, and a smattering of scientific advice.
But wait, there's more: DHS has founded and funded six of its very own "Centers
of Excellence," research facilities that span dozens of universities
from coast to coast. The latest is a Center of Excellence for the Study of Violent
Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism, the funding for which cleared the House
in October. The Center is mandated to assist a National Commission in combating
those "adopting or promoting an extremist belief system? to advance political,
religious or social change."
7. Privatize, privatize, privatize: Of course, homeland
security is not just a department, nor is it simply a new network of surveillance
and data mining - it's big business. (According to USA Today,
global homeland-security-style spending had already reached $59 billion a year in 2006, a
six-fold increase over 2000.)
Not surprisingly, then, universities have, in recent years, established unprecedented
private-sector partnerships with the corporations that have the most to gain
from their research. The Department of Homeland Security's on-campus National
Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism (START), for
instance, features
Lockheed Martin on its advisory board. The Center for Food Protection and Defense
relies on an industry working group that
includes Wal-Mart and McDonald's offering "guidance and direction,"
according to its chair.
While vast sums of money are flowing in from these corporate sponsors, huge
payments are also flowing out into "strategic supplier contracts"
with private contractors, as universities permanently outsource security operations
to big corporations like Securitas and AlliedBarton. Little of this money actually
goes to those guarding the properties, who are often among the most underpaid workers at universities.
Instead, it fills the corporate coffers of those with little accountability
for conditions on campus.
Meanwhile, some universities have developed intimate relationships with private-security
outfits like the notorious Blackwater. Last May, for example, the University
of Illinois and its police training institute cut a deal with the firm to share their
facilities and training programs with Blackwater operatives. Local journalists
later revealed that the director of the campus program at the time was on the Blackwater payroll.
In the age of hired education, such collaboration is apparently par for the
course.
Following these seven steps over the past six years, the homeland security
state and its constituents have come a long way in their drive to remake the
American campus in the image of a compound on lockdown. Somewhere, inside the
growing homeland security state that is our country, the next seven steps in
the process are undoubtedly already being planned out.
Still, the rise of Repress U is not inevitable. The new homeland security campus
has proven itself unable to shut out public scrutiny or stamp out resistance
to its latest Orwellian advances. Sometimes, such opposition even yields a free-speech
zone dismantled, or the Pentagon's TALON de-clawed, or a Project Strike Back
struck down. A rising tide of student protest, led by groups like the new Students
for a Democratic Society, has won free-speech victories and reined in repression
from Pace and Hampton, where the University dropped its threats of expulsion,
to UCLA, where Tasers will no longer be wielded against passive resisters.
Yet, if the tightening grip of the homeland security complex isn't loosened,
the latest towers of higher education will be built not of ivory, but of Kevlar
for the over-armored, over-armed campuses of America.
----------
Michael Gould-Wartofsky is a writer from New York City and a recent
graduate of the new homeland security campus. He has written for the Nation
Online, Z Magazine, Common Dreams, and the Harvard Crimson, where he was a columnist
and editor, and his work has also appeared in Poets Against the War
(Nation Books). He was a recipient of the New York Times James B. Reston Award
for young journalists and Harvard's James Gordon Bennett Prize for his writing
on collective memory. This piece is also appearing in the latest issue of the
Nation Magazine.