Print This Story   E-mail This Story

Also see:
AOL/Microsoft-Hotmail Preventing Delivery of Truthout Communications •
Go to Original
Is That Your Final Question?
The New York Times | Editorial
Tuesday 26 February 2008
Tonight, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama will debate in Ohio. It will be the 20th debate, and possibly the last, of the Democratic presidential campaign. Is there anything left to ask? The Op-Ed page asked five experts to pose the questions that they feel have not been answered over the course of more than a year of campaigning. Here's what they would ask the candidates if they were moderating tonight's debate.
- Responding to a questionnaire from The Boston Globe on presidential power, you both criticized President Bush's use of signing statements, with which he has asserted a constitutional right to bypass more than 1,000 sections of bills that he has signed into law. You both also said you would continue using signing statements, though in a less aggressive way.
But the American Bar Association has called for an end to this practice, and Senator John McCain says he will never issue a signing statement. Why are they wrong?
- Both of you have said the Constitution does not allow a president to detain
a citizen without charges as an enemy combatant. But President Bush won court
rulings upholding the indefinite detention of two Americans as enemy combatants.
Were the courts wrong? Does a president have the authority to interpret the
Constitution differently from the judiciary? Would you ever use the court-approved
authority to hold a citizen indefinitely as an enemy combatant?
- Both of you have said that President Bush cannot attack Iran without first
obtaining Congressional authorization for the use of military force. But two
Democratic presidents, Harry Truman and Bill Clinton, ordered American forces
into extended armed conflicts without Congressional authorization. Did the Korean
and Kosovo wars violate the Constitution? Would an attack on Iran be legally
different, and if so, how?
- Are there any circumstances - including in matters of detention, surveillance,
interrogation and troop deployments - under which you believe that presidents
have the constitutional power as commander in chief to bypass laws in order
to take an action they think is necessary to protect national security?
- Proponents of the so-called unitary executive theory argue that the Constitution
does not allow Congress to enact statutes that place the actions of executive-branch
officials beyond the president's control, such as by giving independent
decision-making authority to the head of a regulatory agency. Do you agree?
- Charlie Savage, a reporter for The Boston Globe and the author
of "Takeover: The Return of the Imperial Presidency and the Subversion
of American Democracy."
- Social Security will go into a cash deficit during the next president's
prospective second term. Therefore, if elected, you will: a) do nothing and
leave growing deficits to your successor; b) cut benefits, eligibility or both,
as President Bush tried; c) raise the payroll tax; or d) there is no d. Those
are the only options.
- Domestic gun owners kill more Americans each year than terrorists have in
total since 2000 (even if you define all American fatalities in Iraq as related
to terrorism). Can the homeland be secure when our schools are not? If your
answer is no, will you take on the National Rifle Association and work for a
gun law with teeth?
- Senator Obama, virtually all economists say trade is good for growth, but
you have blamed trade deals like the North American Free Trade Agreement for
the loss of American jobs. Do you really think building an economic wall along
the Rio Grande will promote a stronger, more resilient American economy, and
if so why?
- Senator Clinton, will you take on your Wall Street friends and raise the
effective income tax on private-equity fund managers and hedge fund managers,
who are now taxed at the capital gains rate of 15 percent? Please explain why
the richest Americans should pay the lowest taxes.
- Senator Obama, you rail against the oil companies, but under the American
system of free enterprise, aren't companies supposed to earn a profit
- and even to charge what the market will bear?
- Franklin D. Roosevelt, a president you both have evoked, said Americans
need fear only fear itself. Under President Bush, Americans have been told to
so fear terrorism that the executive branch has been permitted to snoop on citizens,
hijack the powers of Congress and torture foreigners. Do you agree that fear
of terrorism has been pushed too far, and if so, what measures would you adopt
to return the United States to a more normal civilian life?
- Roger Lowenstein, a contributing writer for The New York Times
Magazine and the author of the forthcoming "While America Aged."
- Both of you have argued for more widespread access to the Internet in schools.
Given the recent "To Read or Not to Read" report from the National
Endowment for the Arts, which revealed a steep decline in reading among young
people, and the lack of evidence that computers in the classroom help students
learn, wouldn't federal funds be better spent on projects that encourage
reading and engagement with the arts?
- The Internet is often praised as a liberating force in American culture,
but it has also drawn comparisons to an unruly mob. Would you support a federally
financed, long-term study of how our use of this technology is changing our
behavior, for good and for ill?
- You have both admitted to being BlackBerry addicts. How has this desire
for constant connection and endless information changed your personal relationships
and how has it transformed political culture?
- Christine Rosen, a fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy
Center and a senior editor of The New Atlantis: A Journal of Technology and
Society.
- The long advocacy for universal health-care coverage by Democrats has earned
a base of public support, but it has also provided an easy focus for political
attacks. Although universal coverage will protect businesses and families from
unmanageable costs, it will also increase government spending considerably and
increase government involvement in health care.
- The strategy you have adopted as candidates is the same one that Democrats
have used for decades without success (including in 1993, when I was a health
policy adviser in the first Clinton administration). You have both designed
plans that aim to minimize government costs and to minimize changes for Americans
with good health coverage, while still constructing a safety net of coverage
for the growing millions without insurance.
- This approach, however, inevitably increases the complexity of our Rube Goldberg
health system. It has made your policies difficult to explain. It has failed
to prevent charges that you are promoting "socialized medicine."
And it has cost you the enthusiasm of Americans who want a simpler, tax-based,
Medicare-for-all system.
- How do you persuade supporters of single-payer health care that your proposals
are worth fighting for? And how can you assure the rest of us that the costs
and complexities of your plans are actually manageable?
- Atul Gawande, a general surgeon, a staff writer for The New
Yorker and the author of "Better: A Surgeon's Notes on Performance."
- Senator Obama, as commander in chief an American president must understand
the sense of honor that motivates his armed forces. Last September, MoveOn.org
ran an advertisement in The Times that mocked Gen. David H. Petraeus, the American
commander in Iraq, as "General Betray Us." You chose not to vote
on the Senate resolution that condemned the advertisement. Would you still characterize
the Senate vote as a "stunt" and "empty politics"?
- Samantha Power, one of Senator Obama's chief foreign policy advisers,
strongly criticized the United States in her book "A Problem From Hell"
for failing to intervene in the 1994 genocide in Rwanda and for the three-year
delay in intervening in the Bosnian war, until the 1995 Srebrenica massacre.
Saddam Hussein also committed genocide by killing thousands of Iraqi Kurds
with chemical weapons in the late 1980s and massacring thousands of Shiite marsh
dwellers in southern Iraq after the first gulf war. How could we have left Mr.
Hussein in power? How can Senator Obama say that removing a genocidal killer
was a "dumb" war?
- Senator Clinton, you have stated that American troop withdrawals from Iraq
will begin as soon as you take office as president. But you also note on your
campaign Web site that you will order "narrow and targeted operations
against Al Qaeda and other terrorist organizations in the region."
Isn't that what the surge is about? The United States and local leaders
have allied to drive out members of Al Qaeda from Baghdad and other areas. How
is your policy any different from the policy of President Bush?
- The 22nd Amendment to the Constitution bars any former president from election
to a third term. Is it truly consistent with the spirit of the Constitution
to have the same professional couple occupying the White House for 12 years?
Isn't this all the more true when Bill Clinton promised that voters would
receive, during his first term, "two for the price of one"?
- Ruth Wedgwood, a professor of international law and diplomacy
at Johns Hopkins, was an adviser to the Rudolph Giuliani campaign.
-------
Jump to today's Truthout Features:
(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. t r u t h o u t has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is t r u t h o u t endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)
"Go to Original" links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted on TO may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the "Go to Original" links.
  Print This Story   E-mail This Story
|

|