News

$4 Gasoline? It's News to Bush

»

Also see:     
AOL/Microsoft-Hotmail Preventing Delivery of Truthout Communications    [

Also see below:     
Dana Milbank | Don't Get Around Much Anymore    [

    $4 Gasoline? It's News to Bush
    By Maura Reynolds, Michelle Quinn and Ronald D. White
    The Los Angeles Times

    Friday 29 February 2008

When asked about the possibility of the price going that high, president says, "That's interesting, I hadn't heard that." He also says a tax hike on oil companies would drive the price up further.


    Washington - The prospect of sharply higher fuel prices, including $4-a-gallon gasoline, may not have made it into Oval Office briefing books, perhaps explaining why President Bush was surprised Thursday when a reporter mentioned what energy analysts are saying could happen soon in many parts of the country.

    "Wait, what did you just say? You're predicting $4-a-gallon gasoline?" Bush responded to a reporter who said some analysts expect prices to soon climb that high. "That's interesting. I hadn't heard that. . . . I know it's high now."

    The price of oil set another record Thursday, jumping $2.95 to close at $102.59 a barrel in New York futures trading.

    But even before the recent surge in oil prices, analysts were predicting that the average price of a gallon of gasoline could reach $3.75 nationwide in the near term and top $4 in states such as California and Hawaii.

    Bush's acknowledged unfamiliarity with the recent cost of gasoline produced some fumes at the pump.

    At a Shell service station in the Bay Area city of San Mateo, the price of a gallon of regular had already reached $4.29, well above the state average of $3.42, as measured by the AAA auto club.

    "Bush is out of touch with a lot of things we are facing today," said 33-year-old Marisa Cajbon, who was filling her Toyota Sequoia SUV with the expensive fuel. "I have to buy gas. I need to work. I have two kids. I think it's unfortunate. I think it's a crime."

    Not surprisingly in a presidential election year, Bush's remark provoked comparisons to his father, George H. W. Bush, who took a serious political hit in 1992 after appearing to be out of touch with Americans' everyday lives.

    The current occupant of the White House isn't seeking reelection, but Democratic presidential hopeful Sen. Barack Obama immediately seized on the gasoline issue, accusing the younger Bush of failing to understand the hardships ordinary Americans are facing as prices rise and the economy falters.

    "When I hear George Bush say that he doesn't think we're in a recession, when somebody tells him that, you know, gasoline prices might reach $4 a gallon and he says, 'That's interesting. I didn't know that'. . . . That's a sign we have a Washington that is out of touch," the senator from Illinois said to cheers and laughter from a crowd of about 2,000 at a campaign stop in Beaumont, Texas.

    Obama's rival for the nomination, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York, expressed concern about fuel costs during a visit with two families in Pomeroy, Ohio. "We need to give more authority to the government to go after these oil companies to ask the hard questions," she said.

    During a White House news conference, Bush tried to put the best spin on months of bleak economic news. "I don't think we're headed to a recession, but no question we're in a slowdown," Bush said.

    In his second day of congressional testimony, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke repeated his warning that the U.S. economy faces a triple threat of declining growth, recurring credit crunches and rising inflation. But in contrast to his assessment Wednesday, the central bank chief shared a note of optimism on the nation's odds of dodging the worst of the problems.

    Bernanke told the Senate Banking Committee that he didn't see much danger of so-called stagflation, the combination of falling growth and rising prices that ravaged the economy three decades ago.

    "I don't think we're anywhere near the situation that prevailed in the 1970s," Bernanke said.

    However, he acknowledged that higher food and fuel prices were creating "inflationary stress" that could make it tougher for the Federal Reserve to keep the economy out of recession by cutting interest rates.

    Bernanke's testimony came as the Commerce Department reported that the gross domestic product, the broadest gauge of the nation's output of goods and services, grew at a weak 0.63% rate in the fourth quarter of last year. Economists had hoped that the GDP number, which the government had estimated at 0.6%, would be revised substantially upward.

    Bush said he understood that uncertainty about the economy was hard on American consumers. But he said the answer was for Congress to make the tax cuts he pushed through in his first term permanent. Many lawmakers have balked, arguing that those reductions have led to a dangerously large federal budget deficit.

    "If you're out there wondering . . . what your life is going to be like and you're looking at $4 a gallon, that's uncertain," Bush said. "And when you couple with the idea that taxes may be going up in a couple of years, that's double uncertainty."

    The average U.S. pump price was $3.16 a gallon Thursday, according to AAA, but higher in many regional markets.

    Roy Persinco, who filled up his Ford 250 pickup truck for $3.25 a gallon at a Santa Monica Shell station Thursday, said he spent $125 a week on gas.

    "I can't believe that an ex-oilman could be so unaware and ignorant of what is going on around him in the real world, but I'm sure his old buddies in the oil industry can tell him they're doing just fine," Persinco said.

    Another motorist, Grant Reese of West Los Angeles, volunteered to help the president keep in touch during his remaining days in office, lest he be caught off guard by the Washington press corps again.

    "I'd be happy to send him all my credit card receipts for gasoline from now on," Reese said, watching the pump top $40 as he filled the tank of his Nissan Altima at a Sam's Club station in Long Beach.

    Energy analysts have offered motorists little solace, saying that the rules of supply and demand for gasoline and other fuels are apparently being overridden, and commodity prices are continuing their run.

    The Energy Department's most recent weekly petroleum report said gasoline inventories were more than 8% above their five-year average. Gasoline demand is about 1% shy of its level of a year ago.

    Tom Kloza, chief oil analyst for the Oil Price Information Service in New Jersey, said the situation was likely to get worse. He expects retail gasoline prices to hit record highs between $3.50 and $3.75 a gallon nationally and that $4 gasoline in California won't be considered a rogue price.

    "I can't see [the average] hitting $4, but then I also couldn't see oil hitting $103 a barrel," he said.

    Reynolds reported from Washington, Quinn from San Mateo, Calif., and White from Los Angeles. Times staff writers Peter G. Gosselin in Washington, Mark Z. Barabak in Beaumont, Texas, and Scott Wilson in Los Angeles contributed to this report.

 


    Go to Original

    Don't Get Around Much Anymore
    By Dana Milbank
    The Washington Post

    Friday 29 February 2008

    The bulletin reached President Bush toward the end of his news conference yesterday.

    Peter Maer of CBS News Radio asked what seemed to be a straightforward question. "What's your advice to the average American who is hurting now, facing the prospect of $4-a-gallon gasoline, a lot of people facing . . . "

    "Wait, what did you just say?" the shocked president interrupted. "You're predicting $4-a-gallon gasoline?"

    "A number of analysts are predicting $4-a-gallon gasoline," Maer explained.

    You could've knocked Bush over with a feather. "Oh, yeah?" he said. "That's interesting. I hadn't heard that."

    Uh-oh. The president, once known for his common-guy skills, sounded eerily like his old man, who in 1992 appeared surprised that supermarkets had bar-code scanners. On Wednesday, the $4-a-gallon forecasts had been on the front page of the New York Times, and on NBC's "Today Show" and CBS's "Early Show." In the days before that, the prediction - made by AAA, among others - was in the Associated Press, the Los Angeles Times, the Boston Globe, the New York Post, the Dallas Morning News, even the Kansas City Star. The White House press secretary took a question about $4 gas at her Wednesday press briefing. A poll last month found that nearly three-quarters of Americans expect $4 gas.

    The president, however, had difficulty grasping the possibility, even after Maer told him. "You just said the price of gasoline may be up to $4 a gallon - or some expert told you that," Bush repeated. "That creates a lot of uncertainty."

    Bush, too, faces a lot of uncertainty, and not of the petroleum-derived variety. In these waning months of the Bush presidency, Congress is increasingly ignoring his ultimatums. Reporters have left him for the campaign trail. And Bush at times seems to be lacking his killer instinct.

    At yesterday's session, NBC's David Gregory invited him to criticize Democratic presidential candidates for not knowing much about the expected new Russian president, Dmitry Medvedev. "I don't know much about Medvedev, either," Bush replied.

    Agence France-Presse's Olivier Knox asked Bush why he was going to the Olympics in China despite the country's human rights record. "I'm a sports fan," the president reasoned.

    And when Michael Abramowitz of The Post asked Bush about his reluctance to talk to hostile foreign leaders, Bush delivered a tirade about the Castro brothers - and then disclosed his intention to give Abramowitz a hug.

    The commander in chief, detached and defanged, seemed less concerned with the power of the presidency than with the topics of his oratory. "I talked about a missile defense system," he said. "I talk about religious freedom. . . . I talk about Darfur and Iran and Burma. . . . I talked about some of the [tax] breaks." And how about his dispute with Democrats in Congress over immunity for phone companies that share records with the government? "I'm going to keep talking about the issue," he vowed. "I will keep talking about the issue and talking about the issue."

    But is the country listening? The White House had limited attendance at the news conference to one reporter per news outlet, but this proved unnecessary; there were two rows of empty seats in the back, and even after foreign journalists filled in the empty seats, there were a few vacant when Bush entered.

    Just before he arrived, the network correspondents doing their stand-ups sounded skeptical about the potential for big news. "The president is using a press conference to once again lean on Congress to get legislation he wants passed," announced CBS's Bill Plante. "Is this possible for a lame-duck president with low numbers?"

    The duck in question got quickly to his familiar lines about the Democrats' weaknesses on terrorism: "We cannot protect our country from terrorist attack." But when Fox News's Mike Emanuel tried to provoke Bush by asking if Democrats "are playing a high-stakes game" with the nation's security, Bush pulled back. "No, I don't think so," he said. "I don't think they're that cynical or devious."

    Likewise, he delivered a not-quite-ultimatum to Turkey about its incursions into northern Iraq. "The Turks need to move quickly, achieve their objective and get out," Bush said.

    "How quickly, sir, do they need to move out?" asked Matt Spetalnick of Reuters.

    "You know, as quickly as possible" was Bush's line in the sand.

    "Days or weeks?"

    "Well, as possible."

    But then, why should Bush worry whether the Turks spend days or weeks in Iraq when he himself has only months left in Washington? Neither did he seem concerned by Gregory's accusation that he "badly misjudged" Russia's Vladimir Putin ("We've had some head butts, diplomatic head butts") or the suggestion by Cox News's Ken Herman that he would take foreign money for his presidential library ("Yes, probably take some foreign money"). Even the lack of a replacement for his top homeland security adviser, who resigned more than three months ago, caused him no worry.

    "We got a fine man named Joel Bagnal working that office right now," Bush said. "He's a real good guy. . . . He knows what he's doing."


IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107, THIS MATERIAL IS DISTRIBUTED WITHOUT PROFIT TO THOSE WHO HAVE EXPRESSED A PRIOR INTEREST IN RECEIVING THE INCLUDED INFORMATION FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES. TRUTHOUT HAS NO AFFILIATION WHATSOEVER WITH THE ORIGINATOR OF THIS ARTICLE NOR IS TRUTHOUT ENDORSED OR SPONSORED BY THE ORIGINATOR.

"VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS ARE PROVIDED AS A CONVENIENCE TO OUR READERS AND ALLOW FOR VERIFICATION OF AUTHENTICITY. HOWEVER, AS ORIGINATING PAGES ARE OFTEN UPDATED BY THEIR ORIGINATING HOST SITES, THE VERSIONS POSTED ON TO MAY NOT MATCH THE VERSIONS OUR READERS VIEW WHEN CLICKING THE "VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS.

Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live.

Add a comment:

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
The following question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Please enter the two words seen below. If you cannot read them you may use the button with circling arrows to get a new one.