On the Duty to Counter Recruitment
By Camillo Mac Bica
t r u t h o u t | Guest Contributor
Wednesday 07 March 2007
Counter recruitment is a strategy for bringing attention to deceptive recruitment
practices and to the immorality and illegality of the war in Iraq. Its ultimate
goal is to discourage enlistment into the military, primarily through counseling
and educating prospective recruits and by denying recruiters access to our schools
and to our children.
Let me begin by saying that counter recruitment is motivated neither by hatred
of America nor hatred of the military. Rather, it is inspired, first and foremost,
by love, like that of a responsible parent who realizes that, besides praise
and approval, sometimes love and responsibility require providing direction
and even correction to a child who has gone astray. Further, it is motivated
by an awareness of a moral and civic responsibility to oppose immoral and unjust
wars, and by a sensitivity and concern for the plight of war victims and for
the young men and women who are dishonestly recruited into the military and
asked - no, required - to fight, kill and die unnecessarily.
Although it is beyond the scope of this essay to argue the issue at length,
the preemptive invasion of Iraq, a sovereign nation, is clearly a violation
both of international and moral law, based as it was on misinformation, faulty
intelligence and lies. There were no weapons of mass destruction. Saddam Hussein
was not the mastermind behind the events of 9/11, nor was he harboring al-Qaeda
terrorists. Further, since it was never intended as a war to save the Iraqi
people from mass slaughter, there was no ongoing or imminent genocide. Neither
can it be justified as a humanitarian intervention. It is a war not of necessity,
nor of last resort, but of choice.
As we begin our fifth year of occupation, with the situation in Iraq continuing
to degenerate into sectarian violence and civil war, it is clear as well that
a military resolution of the debacle is impossible and that our continued military
presence in Iraq merely serves to exacerbate the turmoil and violence.
Even were there a glimmer of hope for a successful military resolution, to
continue to wage, perhaps even to escalate, an illegal and immoral war and occupation
to finish the job and achieve victory because it is in our national interest
to do so, or because to admit a mistake or a crime of aggression would negatively
affect our nation's prestige and standing in the world and devalue the sacrifices
of those who have already suffered and died, makes no moral sense. It is like
arguing that a rapist must persevere in his assault, perhaps even escalate his
violence and kill his victim and eye witnesses, because it is in his interest
to eliminate anyone who could identify him, or because his reputation as a bully
and a thug would be diminished were he to admit a crime of aggression and cut
and run. Further, to continue to wage an immoral and illegal war despite recognition
of its unjustness indicates a wanton disregard for the dictates of morality
and international law.
Such criminal behavior, arrogance and hypocrisy are the characteristics of
a rogue nation. They bring no credibility, prestige or standing in the world
- only disdain, animosity, hatred and righteous indignation. Nor do acts of
aggression bring glory or vindication to those already killed or wounded in
battle. Justice and morality require that an immoral war be ended immediately;
that the aggressors possess the moral courage to acknowledge their crime; that
they make retribution to the victims of their aggression, and apologize to the
citizens of the aggressed nation and the rest of the world community for their
transgression.
Given the dangerous world in which we live, maintaining a proficient and well-trained
professional military is prudent. However, faced with the reality of increasing
recruiter wrongdoing and unscrupulous enlistment practices; of a continuing,
even escalating, illegal and immoral war; of a president who has contempt for,
and arrogantly ignores, the Constitution, international law and treaties, the
recommendations of his military leaders, the advice of Congress and of historical
allies, and most important, the will of the American people, prudence must give
way to the dictates of morality and justice. Prudence must give way to the dictates
of morality and justice.
Consequently, when our beloved nation has lost its moral compass, when alternative
means of conflict resolution have not been creatively explored, when our youth
are aggressively recruited through deceit, misrepresentation and/or coercion
to kill and be themselves killed or maimed unnecessarily, and the military becomes,
not an instrument of national defense or deterrence, but of aggression, oppression
and murder, it is not only permissible, it is morally required, that we counter
recruitment.
This obligation to counter recruitment requires that we protect those most
vulnerable, impressionable young people in our high schools and colleges and
the underprivileged who see the military as their only alternative to poverty,
crime and unemployment from being enticed, seduced, brainwashed and deceived
into becoming complicit in crimes of aggression and cannon fodder for corporate
war profiteers and opportunists. Therefore, we are morally obligated to remove
recruiters from our schools; rescind the No Child Left Behind Act's military
recruitment provision which requires schools, in order to receive financial
assistance under the act, to provide military recruiters with students' contact
and other information; and to inform prospective recruits and their parents
of the realities of military service, the horrors of war, the immorality and
futility of the war in Iraq, and of other educational options and employment
opportunities available to them other than by joining the military. I doubt
this information is contained within a recruiter's motivational packet of hats,
tee shirts, bumper stickers and violent video games.
In conclusion, the duty to counter recruitment is not absolute but situationally
relative. Given the unethical and unscrupulous practices utilized by recruiters
to meet their quotas, the immorality and illegality of the Iraq War and occupation,
the needless sacrifice of thousands of American soldiers and Marines, the unconscionable
killing of hundreds of thousands of Iraqi civilians, the expenditure of billions
of taxpayer dollars that could have been better spent elsewhere, it is clear
that counter recruitment is a moral and civic duty. To do anything less would
be unpatriotic - nay, treasonous and morally irresponsible.
--------
Camillo Mac Bica, Ph.D., is a professor of philosophy at the School
of Visual Arts in New York City. As a veteran recovering from his experiences
as a United States Marine Corps Officer during the Vietnam War, he founded,
and coordinated for five years, the Veterans Self-Help Initiative, AKA the HOOTCH
Program, a therapeutic community of veterans suffering from Post-Traumatic Stress
Disorder, at the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Brooklyn. He
is a long-time activist for peace and justice, a member of the Vietnam Veterans
Against the War, and a founding member of the Long Island Chapter of Veterans
for Peace. His publications include "The Mythologizing of War from Vietnam
to Iraq," in The Humanist Magazine, March/April 2006.
-------
Jump to today's Truthout Features:
(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. t r u t h o u t has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is t r u t h o u t endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)
"Go to Original" links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted on TO may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the "Go to Original" links.
Print This Story
E-mail This Story