Also see:
AOL/Microsoft-Hotmail Preventing Delivery of Truthout Communications •
The Democrats' Problem With Democracy
By Dr. Wilmer J. Leon III
t r u t h o u t | Perspective
Monday 10 March 2008
If the Democrats fail to elect their presidential candidate and allow the "Super
delegates" to select him/her in the smoke-filled back rooms at the convention
in Denver, the Democrats could create a long-term problem with their base. This,
along with the decision to disenfranchise the Democratic voters in Florida and
Michigan, could prove to be the Democrats' problem with democracy. In order
to understand why the super delegate issue could be a problem, it is important
to understand why the rules were created in the first place. For that, you have
to go back to the 1968 Democratic National Convention in Chicago, Illinois.
1968 was a very tumultuous year in American history and politics. Rev. Dr.
Martin Luther King Jr. was assassinated in April and Sen. Robert Kennedy (D-New
York) was assassinated in June. Protests for civil rights and against the Vietnam
War were at their height. These issues and others carried over into the 1968
Democratic National Convention in Chicago, Illinois, resulting in violent protests
as students and others struggled to have their voices heard by the Democratic
Party leadership. As a result of these clashes, the Democratic Party modified
its rules for future elections to make the committed delegate selection process
of their presidential nominee more inclusive and Democratic. The process would
reflect the votes and interests of women and minorities, and not necessarily
the wishes of the party leadership.
Well, democracy is not an exact science, and in 1972, following the new rules,
the Democrats nominated Sen. George McGovern as their presidential candidate.
As an anti-Vietnam war advocate and liberal, Senator McGovern was soundly beaten
by incumbent President Richard Nixon. In 1976, the Democrats nominated Jimmy
Carter and the country elected the relatively unknown governor, even though
Carter was not the favorite of party leadership.
As a result of these experiences and based upon the desire to reclaim control
of the nominating process, the Democratic Party leadership implemented the "unpledged
party leader and elected official delegates," or the "super delegate."
Super delegates are a group of approximately 794 Democratic senators, members
of Congress, governors, former presidents and vice presidents, and other party
officials. These individuals are not committed to candidates, as is the case
with state delegates. They can vote for whomever they choose.
Neither Senator Obama nor Senator Clinton will arrive in Denver in August with
the 2,024 delegates needed to secure the nomination on the first ballot. It
looks like Senator Obama will go to the Democratic National Convention with
more committed delegates than Senator Clinton, but shy of the 2,024 needed to
clinch the nomination. His argument will be that the party elites should not
override what a majority of the Democratic electorate has indicated. Senator
Obama will talk about expanding the party. He will point to the independents
and moderate Republicans that have joined his "movement." He will
argue that if the party elites ignore his coalition ,it will be the death knell
of Democratic politics for decades to come.
Senator Clinton will make the electability argument. The calculus is since
it will take 270 of the 538 available electoral votes to win, there are six
states, the "Big Six," that must be won in order to capture the White
House. These states are California (55), New York (31), Pennsylvania (21), Illinois
(21), Michigan (17) and Ohio (20), for a total of 165 electoral votes. Since
she has already won primaries in New York, California, Ohio, and other states
that a Democrat must win, she is more electable. In her mind, she stands the
better chance of beating Senator McCain in November.
Both arguments have merit, and this issue will cause great consternation at
the Democratic convention. The Democratic process is designed to allow "We
the People" to express our views and have our elected officials carry them
out. On the other hand, the nominating process is designed to field the candidate
that puts his/her party in the best position to be elected. After all, a politician's
primary job is to get elected.
The Democratic Party elite must do some real soul searching and ask themselves
what the party truly stand for. Are they willing to risk a Democratic Party
implosion if Senator Obama maintains his lead in pledged delegates, but the
super delegates select Senator Clinton as their nominee? Even though the super
delegate process is within the rules of the party, African-Americans, in particular,
would feel totally disenfranchised by the party that has benefited from their
uncompromising loyalty for more than 40 years. This move would only validate
the pitch that Republicans have been making to African-Americans about the minimal
rewards for blind loyalty. Why continue to provide your support to a party that
refuses to support you? Independents and other moderate voters would also be
well within their rights to abandon the party that did not carry out their wishes.
It could create a very real and long-term problem for a short-term risk that
has no guarantee of paying off.
The Democrats, other problem is risking the alienation of voters in Michigan
and Florida, two states that have very strong Democratic ties. As it stands
today, neither state's Democratic citizenry will have their voices heard in
a primary nor will they have their delegates seated at the convention. This
seems to have been no more than a power play on behalf of the party leadership
for the sake of a power play. Again, it is a perceived short-term gain that
has created a real long-term problem.
Here's the simple solution: In Florida, the Republican-led state government
will not agree to foot the bill at state taxpayers' expense, nor should they.
Since both the Clinton and Obama campaigns signed onto this bad idea, both campaigns
and the Democratic Party should pay for a revote if this can be done in time.
Why would the Obama campaign agree to this? Even if he loses this primary, the
delegates Senator Clinton gains would not dramatically cut into his lead. He
is selling the sleeves off of his vest. He gains more in the long run in the
court of public opinion by looking magnanimous and truly committed to the democratic
process.
In Michigan, since Senator Obama agreed to stay off the ballot, but Senator
Clinton remained on the ballot, the Obama campaign
and the Democratic Party should split the cost of a revote there. In both states,
it's more important to secure the confidence of Democratic voters than risk
alienating their base in future elections.
John Adams once said, "Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes,
exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit
suicide." If the Democrats don't follow the will of their voters and fail
to reconcile with Michigan and Florida, they will, as they did in 2000 and 2004,
snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. It will be political suicide. The Democrats
will be accused of having a problem with democracy.
--------
Dr. Wilmer Leon is the producer/host of the nationally broadcast call-in
talk radio program "On With Leon," Producer/host of the television
program "Inside the Issues With Wilmer Leon," a regular guest on CNN's
"Lou Dobb's Tonight," and a teaching associate in the Department of
Political Science at Howard University in Washington, DC. Go to www.wilmerleon.com
or email: wjl3us@yahoo.com.
-------
Jump to today's Truthout Features:
(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. t r u t h o u t has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is t r u t h o u t endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)
"Go to Original" links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted on TO may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the "Go to Original" links.
Print This Story
E-mail This Story