Also see:
AOL/Microsoft-Hotmail Preventing Delivery of Truthout Communications •
Go to Original
Triple Shock to the Global Economy
By Eric Le Boucher
Le Monde
Saturday 15 March 2008
You've entered the kingdom of uncertainties. Oil? How high will it go? The
dollar? How far will it drop? The financial crisis? When will it end? Recession?
In the United States? In France? From week to week, the prognosis for each of
these questions eludes us. A dark crisis mechanism is at work that seems impossible
to arrest.
We're suffering the blows of a great triple shock, the scope and the consequences
of which are still difficult to measure, but which we know will profoundly refashion
the global system.
The first shock is the world's shift from the West to the East. The unique
American engine is exhausted, China, Asia are taking over. The second shock
is a consequence of the first: Chinese thirst for raw materials has caused prices
to explode and provoked a return of inflation - dead for 30 years - to the forefront
of concern. The third shock is the financial crisis which persists, expands
and leads to the end of (too-) easy credit.
There is no equivalent for the first shock unless it be the passage of supremacy
from Europe to America during the First World War. The second is like the so-called
"oil" shock of the 1970s. For the final shock, comparison oscillates
among the Great Depression of the 1930s and the more limited crises of the 19th
century and those more recent crises of the 1980s. The three shocks together
have, in any case, an unprecedented scope: boom, boom, boom, they come at once
and act in concert.
The Federal Reserve is blamed for having been the source of the evils of easy
money. The "wizard" Alan Greenspan, adulated only yesterday, decided
on interest rates too low to encourage growth, but that inflated asset bubbles
instead. American households were able to go into debt cheaply and consume more
and more. Imports grew in a straight line; the trade deficit deepened; the dollar
began to weaken.
The United States has other, enviable, "fundamentals:" productivity
gains, a high-tech sector, immigration ... but its debt-fueled growth model
spiraled out of control with respect to real estate. The house was barely purchased
before it gained in value, which allowed it to be refinanced and borrowing to
be increased. Lending organizations invented subprimes to convince households
without the means that they, too, could become property-owners under this system.
Up until the day when, after an increase of 80% between 2000 and 2006, prices
stagnated, forcing those households into bankruptcy.
The subprime crisis is one of excessive indebtedness. The American growth model
will have to change: the return to savings will atrophy consumption; the dollar's
fall could allow exports to take up a part of the slack. How? To what extent?
It's too early to know.
In any case, the American deficit has its complement: the Asian surplus. China
became the United States's workshop, then, as it accumulated monetary reserves,
its creditor. The size of developing economies has grown vertiginously: they
account for 50% of global GNP (in purchasing power parity). The "dragon"
swallows half of global pork production, ditto for cement, a third of steel
production. Its oil consumption will triple between now and 2030. Hence the
surge in energy, metal and food prices.
From now on, food and energy will be more expensive. We are experiencing
the end of a 30-year downward trend in commodity prices. Does that mean the
resurgence of the specter of inflation? Probably not, even if it is too soon
to be entirely reassured. In the immediate future, these elevated prices are
going to corrode purchasing power, slowing both consumption and growth.
To what extent are developing countries autonomous enough to resist the fall
of the American economy, now poised on the verge of recession? This East versus
West "uncoupling" is one major uncertainty.
Then, there's the financial crisis. The collapse of an investment fund in the
American giant Carlyle Group, this week, has come to show that that crisis is
far from being contained. What's new about this crisis is that it does not center
on one country or one bank, but concerns the sui generis construction of the
financial world. Did the Fed's too-low interest rates or the excessive ingenuity
of the math geniuses bring it about? In any case, the banks, and especially
other financial organizations have sold and resold fragile stacks of "products,"
in ignorance of their risks. The regulations that forced these products off-balance
sheet were an incentive to crime, while the obligation to mark to market daily
has precipitated losses. In short, the hyper-finance world offers a great many
subjects for revision, and, in the meantime, fear of new losses, failures and
credit rationing after years of excess is strong.
The three shocks create uncertainty in the short term. Over the longer term,
they will prove not to have been solely negative, and should give birth to a
new economy with multi-polar growth, strong research and development in energy
and agriculture, wiser finance. But the process of giving birth is always agonizing.
Translation: Truthout French language editor Leslie Thatcher.
-------
Jump to today's Truthout Features:
(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. t r u t h o u t has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is t r u t h o u t endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)
"Go to Original" links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted on TO may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the "Go to Original" links.
Print This Story
E-mail This Story