Financial Meltdown: Time for a Holiday From Progressive Politics?
By Dean Baker
t r u t h o u t | Perspective
Monday 24 March 2008
Progressives usually fight for the interests of those at the middle and bottom
at the expense of those on top. However, during this period of unprecedented
financial crisis, when the Wall Street rich are begging for the helping hand
of the government, most progressives appear to be on the sidelines. Rather than
taking advantage of this extraordinary opportunity to reduce inequality and
educate the public about how the economy really works, progressive voices have
been unusually quiet.
While the basic story on the economic crisis should be well known, it is nonetheless
worth repeating. The Federal Reserve Board allowed the growth of an $8 trillion
housing bubble ($110,000 of housing bubble wealth for every homeowner) in the
years from 1996 to 2006. While this bubble was easily recognizable to competent
economists,
the entire political and financial establishments managed to ignore the housing
bubble until it began to burst last year.
The collapse of the bubble is now pushing the economy into a recession. This
is the result of both the direct effect of the collapse on the housing market
and, more importantly, because of the indirect effect the loss of trillions
of dollars of housing wealth has on consumption. Homeowners are rapidly scaling
back their consumption after losing much of their life's savings in the last
year.
The collapse of the housing bubble has inflicted enormous pain on tens of millions
of people, but it is also inflicting pain on Wall Street and the financial sector.
The honchos in this sector include many of the richest people in the country.
With the collapse of the housing bubble, we are finding out they were far less
financially sophisticated than any of us could have imagined. Many banks, brokerage
houses and investment funds took highly leveraged bets that assumed the housing
bubble would not burst. Now that it has burst, some of the richest people in
the country face the risk of a middle-class lifestyle - unless the government
comes to the rescue.
This is where things really get painful. Rather than taking this opportunity
to tighten the screws, many progressives are standing by the sidelines or actually
cheering on plans to bail out the ridiculously rich. The same people - who,
on other days, are fighting to raise the income tax rate on the rich or for
preserving the estate tax - are just watching as the Fed hands taxpayer dollars
to Wall Street, and hoping Congress will come up with tens of billions for buying
the bankers' bad mortgage debt.
There is, of course, a cover story - there always is. We have to let the Fed
bail out the banks or the financial system would collapse. This would hurt everyone,
especially ordinary workers. And the mortgage bailout is supposed to help low-
and moderate-income homeowners.
But the cover stories don't hold water. We can keep the banks running without
bailing out the incredibly rich people who drove them to ruin. England showed
us the way earlier this year with its takeover of Northern Rock, a major bank
that got itself in trouble with bad mortgage debt.
We can also help homeowners without bailing out the banks. The rescue proposals
currently on the table would have the government buy or guarantee mortgages
on homes that are still hugely overpriced. These proposals could give hundreds
of billions of dollars to the banks, while providing little help to homeowners.
Most would still be paying far more on their mortgage, property taxes and insurance
than they would to rent a comparable home. Furthermore, the bailout conditions
virtually guarantee they will never have a dime in equity.
As an alternative to bailing out the banks, we can temporarily change the rules
on foreclosure to give homeowners the right to rent at the fair market rate.
This would provide them with security in their home. More importantly, it would
likely create a situation where most homeowners stay in their house as owners,
since banks would rather renegotiate mortgage terms than end up as landlords.
The Wall Street boys got themselves in a huge mess through their own greed
and stupidity. Now is the time to make sure they enjoy the fruits of their labor.
These are the same people who don't think they should have to pay higher taxes
so kids can get health care and childcare. There is no reason the rest of us
should pay higher taxes so they can keep their mansions in the Hamptons, their
private jets and retinue of personal services. Let's leave this one to the market.
Dean Baker is the co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR). He is the author of The Conservative Nanny State: How the Wealthy Use the Government to Stay Rich and Get Richer (www.conservativenannystate.org). He also has a blog, "Beat the Press," where he discusses the media's coverage of economic issues. You can find it at the American Prospect's web site.
-------
Jump to today's Truthout Features:
Print This Story
E-mail This Story