Go to Original
Supplier Under Scrutiny on Aging Arms for Afghans
By C. J. Chivers
The New York Times
Thursday 27 March 2008
This article was reported by C. J. Chivers, Eric Schmitt and Nicholas
Wood and written by Mr. Chivers.
Since 2006, when the insurgency in Afghanistan sharply intensified, the Afghan
government has been dependent on American logistics and military support in
the war against Al Qaeda and the Taliban.
But to arm the Afghan forces that it hopes will lead this fight, the American
military has relied since early last year on a fledgling company led by a 22-year-old
man whose vice president was a licensed masseur.
With the award last January of a federal contract worth as much as nearly $300
million, the company, AEY Inc., which operates out of an unmarked office in
Miami Beach, became the main supplier of munitions to Afghanistan's army
and police forces.
Since then, the company has provided ammunition that is more than 40 years
old and in decomposing packaging, according to an examination of the munitions
by The New York Times and interviews with American and Afghan officials. Much
of the ammunition comes from the aging stockpiles of the old Communist bloc,
including stockpiles that the State Department and NATO have determined to be
unreliable and obsolete, and have spent millions of dollars to have destroyed.
In purchasing munitions, the contractor has also worked with middlemen and
a shell company on a federal list of entities suspected of illegal arms trafficking.
Moreover, tens of millions of the rifle and machine-gun cartridges were manufactured
in China, making their procurement a possible violation of American law. The
company's president, Efraim E. Diveroli, was also secretly recorded in
a conversation that suggested corruption in his company's purchase of
more than 100 million aging rounds in Albania, according to audio files of the
conversation.
This week, after repeated inquiries about AEY's performance by The Times,
the Army suspended the company from any future federal contracting, citing shipments
of Chinese ammunition and claiming that Mr. Diveroli misled the Army by saying
the munitions were Hungarian.
Mr. Diveroli, reached by telephone, said he was unaware of the action. The
Army planned to notify his company by certified mail on Thursday, according
to internal correspondence provided by a military official.
But problems with the ammunition were evident last fall in places like Nawa,
Afghanistan, an outpost near the Pakistani border, where an Afghan lieutenant
colonel surveyed the rifle cartridges on his police station's dirty floor.
Soon after arriving there, the cardboard boxes had split open and their contents
spilled out, revealing ammunition manufactured in China in 1966.
"This is what they give us for the fighting," said the colonel,
Amanuddin, who like many Afghans has only one name. "It makes us worried,
because too much of it is junk." Ammunition as it ages over decades often
becomes less powerful, reliable and accurate.
AEY is one of many previously unknown defense companies to have thrived since
2003, when the Pentagon began dispensing billions of dollars to train and equip
indigenous forces in Afghanistan and Iraq. Its rise from obscurity once seemed
to make it a successful example of the Bush administration's promotion
of private contractors as integral elements of war-fighting strategy.
But an examination of AEY's background, through interviews in several
countries, reviews of confidential government documents and the examination
of some of the ammunition, suggests that Army contracting officials, under pressure
to arm Afghan troops, allowed an immature company to enter the murky world of
international arms dealing on the Pentagon's behalf - and did so
with minimal vetting and through a vaguely written contract with few restrictions.
In addition to this week's suspension, AEY is under investigation by
the Department of Defense's inspector general and by Immigration and Customs
Enforcement, prompted by complaints about the quality and origins of ammunition
it provided, and allegations of corruption.
Mr. Diveroli, in a brief telephone interview late last year, denied any wrongdoing.
"I know that my company does everything 100 percent on the up and up,
and that's all I'm concerned about," he said.
He also suggested that his activities should be shielded from public view.
"AEY is working on a moderately classified Department of Defense project,"
he said. "I really don't want to talk about the details."
He referred questions to a lawyer, Hy Shapiro, who offered a single statement
by e-mail. "While AEY continues to work very hard to fulfill its obligations
under its contract with the U.S. Army, its representatives are not prepared
at this time to sit and discuss the details," he wrote.
As part of the suspension, neither Mr. Diveroli nor his company can bid on
any further federal work until the Army's allegations are resolved. But
he will be allowed to provide ammunition already on order under the Afghan contract,
according to internal military correspondence.
In January, American officers in Kabul, concerned about munitions from AEY,
had contacted the Army's Rock Island Arsenal, in Illinois, and raised
the possibility of terminating the contract. And officials at the Army Sustainment
Command, the contracting authority at the arsenal, after meeting with AEY in
late February, said they were tightening the packaging standards for munitions
shipped to the war.
And yet after that meeting, AEY sent another shipment of nearly one million
cartridges to Afghanistan that the Combined Security Transition Command-Afghanistan
regarded as substandard. Lt. Col. David G. Johnson, the command spokesman, said
that while there were no reports of ammunition misfiring, some of it was in
such poor condition that the military had decided not to issue it. "Our
honest answer is that the ammunition is of a quality that is less than desirable;
the munitions do not appear to meet the standards that many of us are used to,"
Colonel Johnson said. "We are not pleased with the way it was delivered."
Several officials said the problems would have been avoided if the Army had
written contracts and examined bidders more carefully.
Public records show that AEY's contracts since 2004 have potentially
been worth more than a third of a billion dollars. Mr. Diveroli set the value
higher: he claimed to do $200 million in business each year.
Several military officers and government officials, speaking on condition of
anonymity because of the investigations, questioned how Mr. Diveroli, and a
small group of men principally in their 20s and without extensive military or
procurement experiences, landed so much vital government work.
"A lot of us are asking the question," said a senior State Department
official. "How did this guy get all this business?"
An Ambitious Company
The intensity of the Afghan insurgency alarmed the Pentagon in 2006, and the
American unit that trains and equips Afghan forces placed a huge munitions order
through an Army logistics command.
The order sought 52 types of ammunition: rifle, pistol and machine-gun cartridges,
hand grenades, rockets, shotgun slugs, mortar rounds, tank ammunition and more.
In all, it covered hundreds of millions of rounds. Afghan forces primarily use
weapons developed in the Soviet Union. This meant that most munitions on the
list could be bought only overseas.
AEY was one of 10 companies to bid by the September 2006 deadline.
Michael Diveroli, Efraim's father, had incorporated the company in 1999,
when Efraim was 13. For several years, a period when the company appeared to
have limited activity, Michael Diveroli, who now operates a police supply company
down the street from AEY's office, was listed as the company's sole
executive.
In 2004, AEY listed Efraim Diveroli, then 18, as an officer with a 1 percent
ownership stake.
The younger Diveroli's munitions experience appeared to be limited to
a short-lived job in Los Angeles for Botach Tactical, a military and police
supply company owned by his uncle, Bar-Kochba Botach.
Mr. Diveroli cut off an interview when asked about Botach Tactical. Mr. Botach,
reached by telephone, said that both Michael and Efraim Diveroli had briefly
worked for him, but that after seeing the rush of federal contracts available
after the wars began, they had struck out on their own.
"They just left me and took my customer base with them," he said.
"They basically said: 'Why should we work for Botach? Let's
do it on our own.' "
As Efraim Diveroli arrived in Miami Beach, AEY was transforming itself by aggressively
seeking security-related contracts.
It won a $126,000 award for ammunition for the Special Forces; AEY also provided
ammunition or equipment in 2004 to the Department of Energy, the Environmental
Protection Agency, the Transportation Security Administration and the State
Department.
By 2005, when Mr. Diveroli became AEY's president at age 19, the company
was bidding across a spectrum of government agencies and providing paramilitary
equipment - weapons, helmets, ballistic vests, bomb suits, batteries and
chargers for X-ray machines - for American aid to Pakistan, Bolivia and
elsewhere.
It was also providing supplies to the American military in Iraq, where its
business included a $5.7 million contract for rifles for Iraqi forces.
Two federal officials involved in contracting in Baghdad said AEY quickly developed
a bad reputation. "They weren't reliable, or if they did come through,
they did after many excuses," said one of them, who asked that his name
be withheld because he was not authorized to speak with reporters.
By this time, pressures were emerging in Efraim Diveroli's life. In November
2005, a young woman sought an order of protection from him in the domestic violence
division of Dade County Circuit Court.
The woman eventually did not appear in court, and her allegations were never
ruled on. But in court papers, the woman said that after her relationship with
Mr. Diveroli ended, he stalked her and left threatening messages.
Once, according to the file, his behavior included "shoving her to the
ground and refusing to allow her to leave during a verbal dispute." Other
times, she reported, Mr. Diveroli arrived at her home unannounced and intoxicated
"going about the exterior, banging on windows and doors."
The woman worried that she could not ignore him, court records said, because
his behavior frightened her.
Mr. Diveroli sought court delays on national security grounds. "I am
the President and only official employee of my business," he wrote to
the judge on Dec. 8, 2005. "My business is currently of great importance
to the country as I am licensed Defense Contractor to the United States Government
in the fight against terrorism in Iraq and I am doing my very best to provide
our troops with all their equipment needs on pending critical contracts."
As AEY's bid for its largest government contract was being considered,
Mr. Diveroli's personal difficulties continued. On Nov. 26, 2006, the
Miami Beach police were called to his condominium during an argument between
him and another girlfriend. According to the police report, he had thrown her
"clothes out in the hallway and told her to get out."
A witness told the police Mr. Diveroli had dragged her back into the apartment.
The police found the woman crying; she said she had not been dragged. Mr. Diveroli
was not charged.
On Dec. 21, 2006, the police were called back to the condominium. Mr. Diveroli
and AEY's vice president, David M. Packouz, had just been in a fight with
the valet parking attendant.
The fight began, the police said, after the attendant refused to give Mr. Diveroli
his keys and Mr. Diveroli entered the garage to get them himself. A witness
said Mr. Diveroli and Mr. Packouz both beat the man; police photographs showed
bruises and scrapes on his face and back.
When the police searched Mr. Diveroli, they found he had a forged driver's
license that added four years to his age and made him appear old enough to buy
alcohol as a minor. His birthday had been the day before.
"I don't even need that any more," he told the police, the
report said. "I'm 21 years old."
Mr. Diveroli was charged with simple battery, a misdemeanor, and felony possession
of a stolen or forged document.
The second charge placed his business in jeopardy. Mr. Diveroli had a federal
firearms license, which was required for his work. With a felony conviction,
the license would be nullified.
(Mr. Packouz was charged with battery and the charge was later dropped; he
declined to be interviewed. To avoid a conviction on his record, Mr. Diveroli
entered a six-month diversion program for first offenders in May 2007 that spared
him from standing trial.)
A relative paid Mr. Diveroli's $1,000 bail as his bid for the Afghan
contract was in its final review.
To be accepted, the company had to be, in Army parlance, "a responsible
contractor," which required an examination of its financial soundness,
transport capabilities, past performance and compliance with the law and government
contracting regulations.
The week after a relative paid his bail, the Banc of America Investment Services
in Miami provided Mr. Diveroli a letter certifying that his company had cash
on hand to begin buying munitions on a large scale. It said AEY had $5,469,668.95
in an account.
AEY was awarded the contract in January 2007. Asked why it chose AEY, the Army
Sustainment Command answered in writing: "AEY's proposal represented
the best value to the government."
Eastern Bloc Arsenals
Both the Army and AEY have treated the sources of the ammunition the company
purchases as confidential matters, declining to say how and where the company
obtained it, the prices paid or the quantities delivered.
But records provided by an official concerned about the company's performance,
a whistle-blower in the Balkans and an arms-trafficking researcher in Europe,
as well as interviews with several people who work in state arsenals in Europe,
show that AEY shopped from stocks in the old Eastern bloc, including Albania,
Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Kazakhstan, Montenegro, Romania and Slovakia.
These stockpiles range from temperature-controlled bunkers to unheated warehouses
packed with exposed, decaying ammunition. Some arsenals contain ammunition regarded
in munitions circles as high quality. Others are scrap heaps of abandoned Soviet
arms.
The Army's contract did little to distinguish between the two.
When the United States or NATO buys munitions for themselves, the process is
regulated by quality-assurance standards that cover manufacturing, packaging,
storage, testing and transport.
The standards exist in part because munitions are perishable. As they age,
propellants and explosives degrade, and casings are susceptible to weathering.
Environmental conditions - humidity, vibration, temperature shifts -
accelerate decay, making munitions less reliable.
NATO rules require ammunition to be tested methodically over its life; samples
are fired through braced weapons, and muzzle velocities and accuracy are recorded.
For rifle cartridges, testing begins at age 10 years, according to Peter Courtney-Green,
chief of the Ammunition Support Office of NATO's Maintenance and Supply
Agency.
The Soviet Union, which designed the ammunition that AEY bought, developed
similar tests, which are still in use. But when the Army wrote its Afghan contract,
it did not enforce either NATO or Russian standards. It told bidders only that
the munitions must be "serviceable and issuable to all units without qualification."
What this meant was not defined. An official at the Army Sustainment Command
said that because the ammunition was for foreign weapons, and considered "nonstandard,"
it only had to fit in weapons it was intended for.
"There is no specific testing request, and there is no age limit,"
said Michael Hutchison, the command's deputy director for acquisition.
"As the ammunition is not standard to the U.S. inventory, the Army doesn't
possess packaging or quality standards for that ammo."
When purchasing such munitions, Mr. Hutchison said, the Army Sustainment Command
relies on standards from the "customer" - meaning the Army
units in Afghanistan. And the customer, he said, did not set age or testing
requirements.
With the vague standards in hand, AEY canvassed the field. One stop was Albania,
a fortress state during Soviet times now trying to join NATO. Albania has huge
stocks of armaments, much if it provided by China in the 1960s and 1970s.
The quality of these stockpiles vary widely, said William D. G. Hunt, a retired
British ammunition technical officer who assessed the entire stock for Albania's
Ministry of Defense from 1998 to 2002. He said a military planning to use the
munitions had reason to worry: at least 90 percent of the stockpile was more
than 40 years old.
"If there was any procurement made for combat purposes from that stockpile,
I would be very dubious about it," he said. "I am not suggesting
that all the ammunition would fail. But its performance would tail off rather
dramatically. It is substandard, for sure."
Problems with Albania's decaying munitions were apparent earlier this
month, when a depot outside Tirana, Albania's capital, erupted in a chain
of explosions, killing at least 22 people, injuring at least 300 others and
destroying hundreds of homes.
Before the Army's contractors began shopping from such depots, the West's
assessment of Albanian munitions was evident in programs it sponsored to destroy
them. Through 2007, the United States had contributed $2 million to destroy
excess small-caliber weapons and 2,000 tons of ammunition in Albania, according
to the State Department.
A NATO program that ended last year involved 16 Western nations contributing
about $10 million to destroy 8,700 tons of obsolete ammunition. The United States
contributed $500,000. Among the items destroyed were 104 million 7.62 millimeter
cartridges - exactly the ammunition AEY sought from the Albanian state
arms export agency.
Albania offered to sell tens of millions of cartridges manufactured as long
ago as 1950. For tests, a 25-year-old AEY representative was given 1,000 cartridges
to fire, according to Ylli Pinari, the director of the arms export agency at
the time of the sale.
No ballistic performance was recorded, he said. The rounds were fired by hand.
On that basis, AEY bought more than 100 million cartridges for the Pentagon's
order. The cartridges, according to packing lists, dated to the 1960s.
The company also hired a local businessman, Kosta Trebicka, to remove the ammunition
from its wooden crates and hermetically sealed metal boxes - the standard
military packaging that protects munitions from moisture and dirt, and helps
ensure its reliability and ease of transport in the field.
Mr. Trebicka, in interviews, said Mr. Diveroli wanted to discard the crates
and metal boxes to reduce the weight and cost of air shipments and maximize
profits. Several American officials said they suspected that the packaging was
removed because it bore Chinese markings and the ammunition's age.
The Czech Connection
As the cartridges in Albania were being prepared for shipment to Afghanistan,
Mr. Diveroli began seeking ammunition from the Czech Republic to fill an order
for Iraq's Interior Ministry.
In May 2007, according to two American officials, the Czech government contacted
the American Embassy in Prague with a concern: AEY was buying nine million cartridges
through Petr Bernatik, a Czech citizen who had been accused by Czech officials
of illegal arms trafficking.
The accusations included shipments of rocket-propelled grenades in violation
of an international embargo to Congo, and illegal shipments of firearms to Slovakia.
Mr. Bernatik had publicly denied both accusations. But they were deemed credible
enough in Washington that he was listed on the Defense Trade Controls watch
list, according to one of the American officials.
This list, maintained by the State Department, is used to prevent American
dealers from engaging suspicious traders in their business, in part to prevent
legal arms companies from enriching or legitimizing black-market networks.
AEY has never been implicated in black-market sales. But the Czech government,
which had discretion over the sale, asked the American Embassy if it wanted
Mr. Bernatik involved in AEY's deals, according to the two American officials,
who requested anonymity because they were not authorized to share the contents
of diplomatic discussions.
The United States did not try to block the transaction, one of the American
officials said, in part because equipping Iraq was in the United States'
interest, and also because Mr. Bernatik had been accused, not convicted.
On May 7, 2007, the Czech government issued an export license. Mr. Bernatik,
in a telephone interview, said he arranged seven flights to Iraq for AEY last
year. "We have a normal business collaboration," he said.
A Mysterious Middleman
The international arms business operates partly in the light and partly in
shadows, and is littered with short-lived shell companies, middlemen and official
corruption. Governments have tried to regulate it more closely for years, with
limited success.
As Mr. Diveroli began to fill the Army's huge orders, he was entering
a shadowy world, and in his brief interview he suggested that he was aware that
corruption could intrude on his dealings in Albania. "What goes on in
the Albanian Ministry of Defense?" he said. "Who's clean?
Who's dirty? Don't want to know about it."
The way AEY's business was structured, Mr. Diveroli, at least officially,
did not deal directly with Albanian officials. Instead, a middleman company
registered in Cyprus, Evdin Ltd., bought the ammunition and sold it to his company.
The local packager involved in the deal, Mr. Trebicka, said that he suspected
that Evdin's purpose was to divert money to Albanian officials.
The purchases, Mr. Trebicka said, were a flip: Albania sold ammunition to Evdin
for $22 per 1,000 rounds, he said, and Evdin sold it to AEY for much more. The
difference, he said he suspected, was shared with Albanian officials, including
Mr. Pinari, then the head of the arms export agency, and the defense minister
at the time, Fatmir Mediu.
(Mr. Mediu resigned last week after the ammunition depot explosions; Mr. Pinari
was arrested.) The Albanian government has been infuriated by Mr. Trebicka's
allegations. Sali Berisha, the prime minister, Mr. Mediu and Mr. Pinari all
denied involvement in kickbacks. But Mr. Trebicka said that after he raised
his concerns about Evdin with the Defense Ministry, his company was forced from
the repackaging contract.
On June 11, 2007, Mr. Trebicka and Mr. Diveroli commiserated by phone about
problems with doing business in Albania. Mr. Trebicka surreptitiously recorded
the conversation, and later gave the audio files to American investigators.
The conversation, he said, showed that the American company was aware of corruption
in its dealings in Albania and that Heinrich Thomet, a Swiss arms dealer, was
behind Evdin.
In the recordings, which Mr. Trebicka shared with The Times, Mr. Diveroli suggests
that Mr. Thomet, called "Henri," was acting as the middleman.
"Pinari needs a guy like Henri in the middle to take care of him and
his buddies, which is none of my business," Mr. Diveroli said. "I
don't want to know about that business. I want to know about legitimate
businesses."
Mr. Diveroli recommended that Mr. Trebicka try to reclaim his contract by sending
"one of his girls" to have sex with Mr. Pinari. He suggested that
money might help, too.
"Let's get him happy; maybe he gives you one more chance,"
he said. "If he gets $20,000 from you ... "
At the end, Mr. Diveroli appeared to lament his business with Albania. "It
went up higher to the prime minister and his son," he said. "I can't
fight this mafia. It got too big. The animals just got too out of control."
In e-mail exchanges, Mr. Thomet denied an official role in Evdin. His involvement
in the Albania deal, he said, had been in introducing Mr. Diveroli to potential
partners and officials. Bogdan Choopryna, Evdin's general manager, also
said Mr. Diveroli's allegations were not true. "We listen to the
words of Mr. Diveroli, and then I am responsible for what he is saying?"
he said. In addition to being an official with Evdin, Mr. Choopryna, 27, markets
products for a Swiss company run by Mr. Thomet.
The dispute about Evdin's role and who owns it remains publicly unresolved.
Evdin had incorporated on Sept. 26, 2006 - the week after Mr. Diveroli
bid on the Afghan contract, according to Cyprus's registrar. The company
listed its office in Larnaca, Cyprus, and its general director as Pambos Fellas.
A visit by a reporter to the address found an accounting business above a nightclub.
Evdin had no office or staff there. And Mr. Fellas, who was inside, said that
he was not Evdin's general director, but "a nominee director"
whose sole role was to register the company.
He had registered hundreds of such companies for a fee, he said, and knew nothing
of Evdin's business.
Some signs point back to Switzerland. Mr. Pinari initially told two reporters
that he worked with Evdin via Mr. Thomet. (After a reporter told Mr. Thomet
this, Mr. Pinari changed his story, referring the reporter to Mr. Fellas and
Evdin's office in Cyprus.) Mr. Diveroli also said the Cyprus company was
run by a "Swiss individual."
Mr. Thomet has been accused in the past by private groups, including Amnesty
International, of arranging illegal arms transfers under a shifting portfolio
of corporate names. His activities have also caused concern in Washington, where,
like Mr. Bernatik, he and Evdin are on the Defense Trade Controls watch list,
an American official said.
Mr. Thomet said past claims that he had engaged in illegal arms trading were
caused by "false statements by former competitors."
Hugh Griffiths, operations manager of the Arms Transfer Profile Initiative,
a private organization that researches illicit arms transfers, described Mr.
Thomet as a broker with contacts in former Eastern bloc countries with stockpiles
and arms factories. His proximity to AEY's purchases, Mr. Griffiths said,
raised questions about whether the Pentagon was adequately vetting the business
done in its name.
"Put very simply, many of the people involved in smuggling arms to Africa
are also exactly the same as those involved in Pentagon-supported deals, like
AEY's shipments to Afghanistan and Iraq," he said.
Under the suspension ordered Wednesday, the Army planned to continue accepting
ammunition it had already ordered from AEY. As of March 21, it had ordered $155
million of munitions, according to the Army Sustainment Command.
In Afghanistan, American munitions officers are examining all of the small-arms
ammunition AEY has shipped. The final shipment, which arrived in wooden crates,
included loose and corroded cartridges, according to three officers. At Rock
Island Arsenal, the contracting authority said it was cooperating with investigators,
who have also visited Albania and Afghanistan.
And in Miami Beach, even before the suspension, AEY had lost staff members.
Michael Diveroli, the company's founder, told a reporter that he no longer
had any relationship with the company. Mr. Packouz, who was AEY's vice
president, and Levi Meyer, 25, who was briefly listed as general manager, had
left the company, too.
Mr. Meyer offered a statement: "I'm not involved in that mess anymore."
---------
C. J Chivers reported from Nawa, Afghanistan, Russia and Ukraine;
Eric Schmitt from Washington and Miami Beach; and Nicholas Wood from Tirana,
Albania. Reporting was contributed by Alain Delaquérière and Margot
Williams from New York, James Glanz from Baghdad, and Stefanos Evripidou from
Cyprus.
-------
Jump to today's Truthout Features:
(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. t r u t h o u t has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is t r u t h o u t endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)
"Go to Original" links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted on TO may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the "Go to Original" links.