Go to Original
Middle East Peace Goes Through the Golan
By Pierre Rousselin
Le Figaro
Monday 28 April 2008
Since the year 2000 and the end of the Clinton administration, no progress
has been possible between Jerusalem and Damascus with respect to an Israeli
withdrawal from the Golan, a pre-requisite condition for any peace between Israel
and Syria. Things are changing. Last week, the mediation Turkey has been discreetly
conducting since April 2007 became public knowledge - to the extent that Turkish
Prime Minister Recep Erdogan went to Damascus to discuss the state of progress
in his efforts with President Bachar el-Assad.
So, Syria and Israel are once again ready to talk peace, and, above all, desire
that it be known that is the case. Even if they're far from agreement, that's
notable progress.
Direct talks with the Israelis will not take place until a new American administration
is in place. Such negotiations will, in fact, require the United States' guarantee
and President George W. Bush "has neither the vision, nor the will to promote
the peace process," noted President Bachar el-Assad.
So he specified that the objective of the exercise is to be ready for a change
in United States' diplomacy after next November's elections.
Israeli officials have the same concern. They know that they'll have trouble
finding a White House interlocutor as indulgent as George W. Bush. Showing themselves
ready for dialogue may be useful for winning the trust of the next president.
That's the minimalist explanation. The other consists of saying that the Israelis
are trying to protect themselves against a possible rapprochement between Washington
and Tehran.
In fact, everyone knows that an Israeli-Syrian discussion cannot limit itself
to the Golan Heights - conquered by Israel in 1967 and which served as the springboard
for Syrian attacks during the 1973 Yom Kippur War. At a time of weapons of mass
destruction and international terrorism, the Golan's strategic interest is not
what it once was for Israel. In fact, even if it remains unmentioned, there
are many other subjects - more serious, more difficult and more essential to
the region's future - in the "basket" of negotiations with Damascus.
There are the ties that Syria maintains with Palestinian Hamas, the leadership
of which is located in Damascus. Israel will demand that the offices of the
Islamist organization in the Syrian capital be closed. There's also the Syrian
support for Hezbollah. Israel will require guarantees that the threat the Shiite
militia brings to bear against its northern border cease.
On the Syrian side, the Golan is a historic and fundamental claim. Sooner or
later, they say in Damascus, it will return to Syria. More important is to maintain,
or rather to reestablish, the Syrian stranglehold over Lebanon. Israel has no
intentions on the land of cedars and could accommodate itself to a Syrian presence,
on condition its own security be guaranteed. There is a possible entente there.
None of this is without impact on the close ties Syria has woven with Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad's Iran. Lebanon and the role assigned to Hezbollah are at the heart
of the partnership that has been composed between the Islamic Republic and the
Syrian regime. Does Syria want to distance itself from Tehran?
It so happens that Iranian leaders didn't budge when their Syrian allies started
to talk peace with Israel. What must be deduced from that? There we enter into
the unfathomable mysteries of the Middle East, among which the unclarified assassination
of Hezbollah's terrorist leader, Imad Moughnieh, in February, or the latest
"revelations" about the Israeli raid against a Syrian nuclear installation
supplied by North Korea.
Whatever the case, Turkish mediation has much to do. And that it should be
the Turks at work says much about the United States' temporary marginalization
in the Middle East, as well as about Europe's chronic impotence.
Translation: Truthout French language editor Leslie Thatcher.
-------
Jump to today's Truthout Features:
(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. t r u t h o u t has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is t r u t h o u t endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)
"Go to Original" links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted on TO may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the "Go to Original" links.
Print This Story
E-mail This Story