Go to Original
Top US Officer Says Would Prefer No War on Iran
Reuters
Monday 05 May 2008
Jerusalem - U.S. military involvement in Afghanistan and Iraq would make it
difficult to mount any attack on Iran, the Pentagon's top officer said in remarks
broadcast on Monday, adding that he would prefer to avoid a new regional war.
"I actually am very hopeful that we don't get into a position where we
have to get into a conflict," Adm. Michael Mullen, chairman of the Joint
Chiefs of Staff, told Israel's Channel Ten television when asked if he might
recommend that U.S. forces strike Iranian nuclear facilities preemptively.
"It would be a very significant challenge for the United States right
now to get into a third conflict in that part of the world," Mullen added,
referring to the Bush administration's long-running military commitments in
Iraq and Afghanistan.
Washington is leading efforts to curb Iran's nuclear plans through U.N. Security
Council sanctions, but has also hinted that war could be a last resort for denying
Tehran - which insists it seeks atomic energy only - the means to make a bomb.
Jittery since Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's 2005 call for the Jewish
state to be "wiped off the map", Israeli officials have been lobbying
for a tougher global stand against their arch-foe.
"I certainly share the concern about Iran and about the leadership, and
I think it is very important that we increase as much as possible the financial
pressure, the diplomatic pressure, the political pressure, and at the same time
keep all the military options on the table," Mullen said.
Believed to have the Middle East's only atomic arsenal, Israel bombed Iraq's
nuclear reactor in 1981. Israeli war planes also destroyed a site in Syria last
September which U.S. officials said was that of a secret nuclear program, though
Damascus denied having any such facility.
"Certainly the situation with Syria is a troubling one and the development
of this nuclear reactor was a troubling one indeed, and it is also indicative
of what can be done out of the sight of people," Mullen said.
"You just can't be sure whether someone isn't developing one somewhere
else."
Speculation that Israel could attack Iranian nuclear sites alone has been offset
by assessments that its armed forces are too limited for the task. Iran is widely
expected to retaliate for any such strike by targeting Israel and U.S. assets
in the Gulf.
--------
Writing by Dan Williams; editing by Sami Aboudi.
-------
Jump to today's Truthout Features:
(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. t r u t h o u t has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is t r u t h o u t endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)
"Go to Original" links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted on TO may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the "Go to Original" links.
Print This Story
E-mail This Story