Go to Original
Lawyers for Guantanamo Inmates Accuse US of Eavesdropping
By William Glaberson
The New York Times
Wednesday 07 May 2008
One lawyer for Guantánamo detainees said he replaced his office telephone
in Washington because of sounds that convinced him it had been bugged. Another
lawyer who represents detainees said he sometimes had other lawyers call his
corporate clients to foil any government eavesdroppers.
In interviews and a court filing Tuesday, lawyers for detainees at Guantánamo
said they believed government agents had monitored their conversations. The
assertions are the most specific to date by Guantánamo lawyers that officials
may be violating legal principles that have generally kept government agents
from eavesdropping on lawyers.
"I think they are listening to my telephone calls all the time,"
said John A. Chandler, a prominent lawyer in Atlanta and Army veteran who represents
six Guantánamo detainees.
Several of the lawyers, including partners at large corporate law firms, said
the concerns had changed the way they went about their work apart from Guantánamo
cases. A lawyer in Chicago, H. Candace Gorman, said in an affidavit that she
was no longer accepting new clients of any type because she could not assure
them of confidentiality.
The new filing, by the Center for Constitutional Rights, came in a 2007 lawsuit
under the Freedom of Information Act in which Guantánamo lawyers are seeking
records to determine whether they have been targets of surveillance.
The Justice Department declined to comment Tuesday. But in a legal response
in March, its lawyers said they could neither confirm nor deny that detainees'
lawyers had been targets of such surveillance "because doing so would
compromise the United States Intelligence Communities sources and methods."
Justice Department officials have said in the past that they had not used their
terrorist surveillance powers to single out lawyers but that telephone "calls
involving such persons would not be categorically excluded."
Since 2001, lawyers representing terrorism suspects not being held at Guantánamo
have said they suspected government eavesdropping. Justice Department officials
have said they intercepted such lawyers' conversations rarely and inadvertently.
But some detainees' lawyers say they believe there may be a comprehensive
effort to monitor their communications at Guantánamo and elsewhere.
In the Tuesday filing in United States District Court in Manhattan, Thomas
B. Wilner, a partner at Shearman & Sterling, said government officials insisting
on anonymity had told him twice that he "should be careful in my electronic
communications."
In addition to being a leading Guantánamo lawyer, Mr. Wilner is an international
trade law specialist. "You need to be very careful in what you say on
the telephone," he said in an interview.
Ms. Gorman's court filing said that during a visit to the Guantánamo
naval base in Cuba, her military escort "referred in conversation to
personal information about my family that I had not disclosed to him,"
leaving her to wonder how that information had been obtained.
Several of the lawyers said a program of surveillance would be consistent with
obstacles they had encountered in representing detainees. In 2004, officials
proposed "real-time monitoring" of lawyers' interviews
with Guantánamo detainees.
A federal judge barred that, saying that listening to lawyers' meetings
failed to recognize "the exceptional place in the legal system of the
United States" for attorney-client communications.
Guantánamo officials say they monitor attorney-client meetings for the
safety of lawyers with video cameras but that meeting areas are not wired for
sound.
But several lawyers said their clients had told them that shortly after detainees
met with lawyers, interrogators had asked the detainees about topics that had
been discussed.
The Guantánamo spokeswoman, Cmdr. Pauline A. Storum, said interrogators
were trained not to inquire about attorney-client meetings.
Shayana Kadidal, the lawyer at the Center for Constitutional Rights handling
the freedom of information case, said there were many practical consequences
of surveillance concerns. For example, he said, lawyers challenging the Bush
administration's detention policies must travel worldwide for meetings
with witnesses to avoid potential telephone or e-mail monitoring.
Jonathan Hafetz of the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University represents
two brothers from Qatar, Jarallah al-Marri, who is held at Guantánamo,
and Ali Saleh Kahlah al-Marri, who is held at the navy brig in Charleston, S.C.,
the only person on the American mainland known to be held as an enemy combatant.
After 16 months during which Ali al-Marri was held incommunicado, Mr. Hafetz
was permitted to discuss the case with him. In 2006, Mr. Hafetz said, a guard
commander told Mr. Marri that he had to speak in English during a conversation
with his lawyer.
Mr. Hafetz wrote government officials asking whether the English-only requirement
indicated that his conversations with his client were being monitored.
Mr. Hafetz said the commander of the brig later said there was no military
surveillance. Mr. Hafetz said he never received a response about whether other
agencies had listened to their conversations.
-------
Jump to today's Truthout Features:
(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. t r u t h o u t has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is t r u t h o u t endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)
"Go to Original" links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted on TO may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the "Go to Original" links.
Print This Story
E-mail This Story