Go to Original
FBI Withdraws Digital Library's National Security Letter
By Paul Elias
The Associated Press
Wednesday 07 May 2008
San Francisco - A nonprofit digital library has successfully fought an FBI
attempt to seize information about one of its users, and is calling on other
groups to challenge government agencies attempting to obtain online customer
information without a judge's order.
The FBI presented the San Francisco-based Internet Archive with a national
security letter in November asking for a library patron's records. The group
sued the agency a month later, alleging the letter violated free speech rights
because they prohibit recipients from talking to anyone else about them.
The Internet Archive said Wednesday the FBI agreed to withdraw the letter last
week and make the case, which had been filed under seal, public. Sections of
the lawsuit and supporting documents detailing what and who investigators were
looking into have been blacked out.
National security letters are used to compel businesses to turn over customer
information without a judge's order or grand jury subpoena. They are most typically
served on Internet service providers and telephone companies demanding billing
records, subscriber information and other electronic communication transactional
records.
The companies receiving the letters are barred from telling customers who are
the targets of the FBI demands.
The FBI defended its demand Wednesday on the Internet Archive in particular
and the letters in general as important weapons to fight terrorism.
"The information requested in the national security letter was relevant
to an ongoing, authorized national security investigation," Assistant FBI
Director John Miller said in a statement. He said the NSLs "remain indispensable
tools for national security investigations and permit the FBI to gather the
basic building blocks for our counterterrorism and counterintelligence investigations."
The FBI didn't explain what prompted the agency to settle this case.
The FBI issued nearly 200,000 of the letters between 2003 and 2006 but has
been challenged in court only three times, said American Civil Liberties Union
lawyer Melissa Goodman, who represented the Internet Archive.
Goodman said the FBI has lost all three challenges, including in a case last
year that a federal judge in New York ruled the letters unconstitutional. The
government has appealed that decision.
"Without judicial or public oversight, there is literally nothing stopping
the FBI from issuing improper demands for records," Goodman said.
FBI Director Robert Mueller has conceded that the bureau improperly used NSLs
without proper authorization and in non-emergency situations between 2003 and
2005, but has told Congress the FBI had since instituted better safeguards.
Goodman and others involved in the San Francisco case, including Internet Archive
founder Brewster Kahle, declined to discuss any details about the information
the FBI sought or the name of the patron.
Another Internet Archive attorney, Kurt Opsahl of the Electronic Frontier Foundation,
said the library collects "extremely limited nonpublic information"
and that publicly available data was given to the FBI.
The Internet Archive was launched in 1996 in collaboration with the Library
of Congress, the Smithsonian Institution, and other public organizations to
provide a permanent record of Web pages. Its Wayback Machine function lets users
access some 55 billion pages of archived Internet pages that may no longer be
available for viewing anywhere else.
-------
Jump to today's Truthout Features:
(In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. t r u t h o u t has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this article nor is t r u t h o u t endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)
"Go to Original" links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted on TO may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the "Go to Original" links.