Share

Citizens Back Action, Despite Lobbying Surge

by: Matthew Berger  |  Inter Press Service

Washington - As both Washington and the international community come gradually closer to taking substantive action on climate change at a high-level conference in Copenhagen, a side effect of this progress has been a parallel increase in the intensity of campaigns opposing such action – which may be a factor in the slight dip in the U.S. public's concern about climate change.

The number of U.S. respondents who believe greenhouse gas emissions will lead to global warming dropped from 71 to 51 percent between 2007 and 2009, according to a poll released by Harris Interactive Wednesday. This drop is deeper, though similar, to the results of other polls released in the past several weeks.

Despite the decrease, a majority of the U.S. public still remains staunchly behind efforts to combat climate change. A poll released Thursday by WorldPublicOpinion.org, and commissioned by the World Bank, found a majority in the U.S. – and 13 of the other 14 countries surveyed - are willing to pay more for energy and other products as part of this effort.

A large reason for the decline that recent U.S. polls have found in the size of this majority may be the increasing political polarisation that has swept Washington since last fall's presidential campaign, and particularly the shift further right by many Republicans.

A Washington Post-ABC News poll released last week found the percentage of Republicans that believe climate change is happening has decreased from 76 to 54 percent over the last three-and-a-half years, while the percentage of the general U.S. population that believes it is happening merely dipped from 80 to 72 percent.

The Pew Research Center for People & the Press likewise found, in October, that the number of Republicans who believe there is "solid evidence" has halved from 62 to 35 percent since 2007.

Legislation to reduce greenhouse gas emissions was not even a remote possibility with President George W. Bush in office – nor with the Republican-controlled Congress of much of the past two decades. But when President Barack Obama entered the White House with substantial Democratic majorities in both houses, climate change action became a real possibility in the U.S.

While some rejoiced, a large number of businesses and interest groups seem to have felt the time was right to panic. Over 460 business and interest groups began lobbying Congress on climate change in the 12 weeks prior to the House passing their version of climate legislation in June, according to analysis of lobbying records by the Center for Public Integrity.

This means the number of companies and organisations lobbying on climate issues jumped from 760 companies at the end of 2008 to 1,150 in June, they say.

This number includes a variety of interests, but 200 of the 460 were manufacturers and their advocacy groups and another 130 were power companies and utilities. The amounts spent on lobbying are not public information, but it is clear there has been a surge in new advocacy groups and campaigns in the past year.

The American Petroleum Institute-led coalition Energy Citizens, for example, was launched in August and, in October, unveiled a seven-figure ad campaign in states whose senators are thought to be swing votes on climate legislation.

New pro-legislation groups, like the environmental-labour coalition Blue-Green Alliance, have formed as well, but these are seen as largely arising to counter the newly-energised opposition effort. It is also true that environmental groups and other advocates of climate action have been lobbying for climate action for years, long before domestic action was a realistic possibility.

While it may be a factor, it is doubtful whether the decrease in the U.S. public's belief in climate change is completely attributable to an increase in opposition to climate legislation, cautions the Natural Resource Defense Council's Michael Ono.

He concedes though that "the closer we get to action the harder the opposition is going to work to stop it" and that this has been the case so far as regards the actions that have been taken under the Obama administration.

The main point he takes from the polls, though, is that "despite the efforts of the opposition, the majority of Americans still want climate action".

Global Support Holding Strong


The Word Bank-commissioned poll shows this U.S. majority joining up with majorities in a range of countries. In addition to the majority of U.S. consumers, a majority in Japan, France, India, Mexico and Kenya – among others – would all be willing to pay a monthly amount equal to one percent to one-half of a percent of their country's GDP per capita.

Russia was the lone country where the majority opposed this financial climate action, while Vietnam and China had, by far, the largest majorities in favor. Bangladesh's was third.

Like the World Bank poll, a Wall Street Journal/NBC poll released at the end of October also found more U.S. respondents in favour of the possibility of paying more in exchange for lower greenhouse gas emissions – 48 versus 43 percent.

Somewhat puzzling at first glance in the Bank's poll, though, are the numbers on whether respondents feel their country should contribute to efforts to "help poor countries deal with climate-induced changes".

Vietnam, Indonesia and Bangladesh are the most eager to help – with 98, 96 and 93 percent feeling their country should help. Bangladesh is considered one of the countries most exposed to the dangers brought by climate change, especially rising sea levels.

The poll's authors offer an interpretation: "Especially noteworthy was the high level of public support in less developed countries to act in solidarity, aiding other countries that are not unlike themselves."

Only 54 percent of U.S. respondents believe their country should contribute to these international efforts to help climate change-affected poor countries, surpassed only by Russia's 50 percent.

In terms of U.S. support of climate action and the science and projections underlying it, a rather whopping 14 percent of the U.S. population believes climate change will never "harm people substantially". The next closest country was Japan, at four percent.

In contrast, an EU survey released Wednesday found Europeans view climate change as the world's second most pressing concern, after it was replaced briefly by the economic recession in last year's poll.

 

Creative Commons License
This work by Truthout is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.

  

»


Ips_logo
Visit IPS news for fresh perspectives on development and globalization.

Comments

This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.

Climategate's full impact

Climategate's full impact has not yet fully sunk in. When it does, you will see support for spending taxpayer money on climate change plummet. Already there are millions more google hits for a search of "climategate" than "climate change". It is a groundswell that cannot be stopped. The longer the mainstream media blow it off, the less credibility they will have. Thank goodness Al Gore invented the internet!

Not one mention of the

Not one mention of the released emails and data from CRU? Maybe the reason people are finding it hard to believe in global warming is because much of it is just nonsense.

"The number of U.S.

"The number of U.S. respondents who believe greenhouse gas emissions will lead to global warming dropped from 71 to 51 percent between 2007 and 2009, according to a poll released by Harris Interactive Wednesday." First of all, don't trust any poll in this country. Recall the pollsters in CT several years ago interviewing dogs and cats that all vowed to vote Republican. This polling company was caught and fined, but many go uncaught. And at the same time regard the idiots who cannot get themselves "to believe" that climate warming is a problem for the human race & planet as a victory for the Republican and conservative-Democrat cheerleading media -- Fox News and other mainstream media networks that repeat "ad nauseum" cliches and slogans meant to purposely confuse the populace. The truth is that those media networks that endanger our eco-survival threaten our -- not only national, but - GLOBAL security -- & should be (or should I say should have been) raided and closed down by the FTC, EPA, and FCC for conspiring to deceive the public. As long as big-mouth liars, like Beck, O'Reilly and Hannity (puppets doing to bidding of their Master, Rupert Murdock) express their "freedom of speech" by overtly lying about such crucial matters as climate change, single payer insurance, the value of war escalation, bail outs, publicly funded elections, the value of lobbyists in Washington, etc.,this nation will never get out of the military and economic conundrum it has got itself into through untamed and "unrecognized" media-inflicted deception. Without the drone of a lying media, we'd be able to get the right people in office (progressives) and have the proper legislation passed.

This is supposed to be

This is supposed to be science, not religion. Show us the un-modified, origional data. "Belief" has nothing to do with it.

My my. A small attack of the

My my. A small attack of the conserva-droids against climate change action. The millions of dollars spent by Big Oil to confuse the issue won't work. Neither will trolling climate change news posts and planting opposition views. There's every reason to believe human-induced climate change is real, because scientific evidence proves the atmosphere is warming consistently over many years due to increasing concentration of CO2. And it spells disaster for many of the world's people if not immediately addressed. Fear is a powerful motivator, right-wingers know that better than anyone.