Lieberman Was for a Medicare Buy-In Before He Was Against it
Tuesday 15 December 2009
by: Jason Leopold, t r u t h o u t | Report
Sen. Joe Lieberman, (I-Connecticut), has threatened to derail passage of a health care reform bill in the Senate if the legislation includes a measure to expand Medicare to individuals beginning at age 55, a proposal Lieberman says he has long opposed. [For background, please see Truthout's report on the Senate's latest health care reform proposals.]
But as Brian Beutler of Talking Points Memo noted Monday, Lieberman has long "supported the idea of a Medicare buy-in as a promising vehicle for reform, including... as recently as three months ago."
Asked specifically about his position this past September, Lieberman now says that the Senate Finance Committee bill, finalized in October, dealt with the problem of the uninsured so well that the buy-in became redundant.
Lieberman denied that he had flip-flopped on the issue as he headed to a meeting Monday evening with the Democratic caucus.
"I didn't change my mind," Lieberman said. "I've been in this position for the last few weeks.
"We've got this very strong network and system of subsidies for people, including people who are 55-65 so the idea of the Medicare buy in no longer was necessary because they're taken care of very well under the Finance Committee proposal."
But an interview the Connecticut Post conducted with Lieberman last September, as first reported by the Plumline's Greg Sargent, should put the senator's denials to rest.

This work by Truthout is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.




Comments
This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.
Well, they gave away the
Tue, 12/15/2009 - 22:55 — Anonymous (not verified)Does anyone get the feeling
Wed, 12/16/2009 - 05:25 — Sushi (not verified)Joe Liberman sold out, some
Wed, 12/16/2009 - 11:58 — Anonymous (not verified)One can but wonder whether,
Wed, 12/16/2009 - 13:24 — Anonymous (not verified)Dr. Dean, head of the Dem
Wed, 12/16/2009 - 16:04 — Anonymous (not verified)Lieberman is a distraction.
Wed, 12/16/2009 - 23:42 — Anonymous (not verified)First to Anonymous at 22:55,
Thu, 12/17/2009 - 00:03 — Devon J. Noll, MPA (not verified)Be civil, says the blurb at
Thu, 12/17/2009 - 01:49 — Anonymous (not verified)Stepping back and examining
Thu, 12/17/2009 - 06:32 — Anonymous even in Cascadia (not verified)Dump the Dems , all of them.
Thu, 12/17/2009 - 07:07 — Anonymous (not verified)Lieberman is clearly serving
Thu, 12/17/2009 - 07:49 — Regina (not verified)In response to: Devon J.
Thu, 12/17/2009 - 08:28 — Anonymous (not verified)Things will not change in
Thu, 12/17/2009 - 23:20 — Straight-Ahead (not verified)I agree, Obama is a fool
Thu, 12/17/2009 - 23:24 — Anonymous (not verified)I'm tired of liars and
Fri, 12/18/2009 - 01:47 — Don (not verified)