Fighting Over the Squandered Decade
Wednesday 30 December 2009
by: E.J. Dionne Jr., Op-Ed

(Photo: Beverly & Pack; Edited: Jared Rodriguez / t r u t h o u t)
Washington - Certain decades shape the country's political life for generations by leaving behind an era to embrace or, at least as often, to scorn.
The 1960s were definitely such a decade. The 1930s qualify, and so do the 1980s. But as important as all these periods have been, their significance may be dwarfed by the reckless and squandered decade that is, mercifully, ending.
I'm afraid that the past 10 years will be seen as a time when the United States badly lost its way by using our military power carelessly, misunderstanding the real challenges to our long-term security, and pursuing domestic policies that constrained our options for the future while needlessly threatening our prosperity.
I am aware that the previous paragraph is thoroughly controversial, and that befits any description of a politically consequential decade. Much of the contention surrounding Barack Obama's presidency is simply a continuation of our argument over the effects of George W. Bush's time in office.
That is why Obama, despite his fervent wishes, has been unable to usher in a new period of consensus. Bush's defenders know that Obama's election represented a popular reaction against the consequences of the 43rd president's time in office. Because Obama is both the anti-Bush and the leader of the post-Bush cleanup squad, his success would complete the rebuke. So the Bush camp -- Karl Rove's regular contributions to The Wall Street Journal's opinion pages are emblematic -- must stay on the attack.
Domestically, Obama inherited an economic catastrophe. Dealing with the wreckage required a large expenditure of public funds that increased a deficit already bloated by the previous president's decision to fight two wars and to cut taxes at the same time. Bush's defenders, preferring to focus attention away from this earlier period of irresponsibility, act as if the world began on Jan. 20, 2009, by way of saddling Obama with the blame for everything that now ails us. But the previous eight years cannot be wished away.
Our current president is more deliberate about the use of American power than his predecessor was, and determined to repair America's image with other nations. Obama is committed to fighting terrorism, but does not believe that a "war on terror" should define American foreign policy.
This leads directly to another essential argument over the meaning of the last decade: whether the proper response to the 9/11 attacks included not only the widely supported retaliation in Afghanistan but also the invasion of Iraq. Obama's view -- that the Iraq War wasted American power and dissipated good will toward us around the world -- is a direct reproach to the core assumptions of the Bush foreign policy.
So is Obama's refusal "to set goals that go beyond our responsibility, our means, or our interests," as he put it in his recent West Point speech, as well as his insistence upon appreciating "the connection between our national security and our economy." This measured approach to the use of force is antithetical to a foreign policy based on "bring 'em on" and sweeping pledges to "defeat our enemies across the world."
But this makes it imperative for Obama to inspire trust in his capacity to thwart terrorism, and his administration's initial response to the Christmas Day airliner attack fell short. Republicans were shameless in politicizing the incident, knowing that rehabilitating Bush's approach to terrorism depends upon discrediting Obama's. The president can't afford to give them anything to work with, as he finally seemed to grasp on Tuesday.
It should not surprise us that the battle for the future will be shaped by struggles over the past. How often over the last 40 years have conservatives defended their policies in the name of rolling back "the excesses of the '60s"? For even longer, liberals were charged with being locked into "the New Deal approaches of the 1930s." Liberals, in turn, pointed proudly to both eras as times of unparalleled social advance.
As for the 1980s, they remain a positive reference point for conservatives even as progressives condemn the Age of Reagan for opening the way to the deregulatory excesses that led to the recent downturn.
Americans instinctively recoil at living too much in the past. Yet we have no choice but to reach a settlement about the meaning of the last 10 years. It is the only way we will successfully turn the next 10 into a decade of renewal.
(c) 2009, Washington Post Writers Group

This work by Truthout is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.




Comments
This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.
"That is why Obama, despite
Fri, 01/01/2010 - 17:55 — Anonymous (not verified)"That is why Obama, despite his fervent wishes, has been unable to usher in a new period of consensus" Really?
1. How do you know his "fervent wishes"? He's acted differently from Bush? How? same power elite players, different style.
2. More deliberate in the use of power? Any evidence? His new "surge" is no different from any McCain might have launched. Of course, McCain wouldn't have had the Nobel platform our peace maker in chief did.
Stop reprinting the speeches and start looking at the actions of this already failed administration that has doomed us to ten more years of the same policies.
This decade will ultimately
Fri, 01/01/2010 - 18:28 — Anonymous (not verified)This decade will ultimately be remembered as the era of corruption.
In which nearly every institution of business, government, media, education, and religion melted from the top down.
Eventually the criminal fascist takeovers, with GWB correctly featured as enabler or figurehead of the deadly scourge will be fully revealed, understood, and recorded in the annals of history with shame, disgust, and amazement at it's sheer stupidity.
The next decade will witness the long struggle to moral normalcy and stability.
There will be bright moments and innovations during this time along with hardships and some deadly attempts by the still (but not for long) wealthy criminals.
Obama and Clinton before him
Fri, 01/01/2010 - 20:48 — Robert B. (not verified)Obama and Clinton before him have had the unenviable job of mopping up the messes left by previous Republican administrations, while at the same time being denounced by the right wing nuts. Rush Limbaugh called the first day of Clinton's presidency "America held hostage, day one." And every time Republicans hold power, they create more messes. You'd think people would stop voting for them, wouldn't you?
Ten years lost from
Fri, 01/01/2010 - 21:18 — Anonymous (not verified)Ten years lost from returning the planet to habitable condition.... oh, wait..... we're still chopping, drilling, spewing, and discharging unabated with no end in sight. Why is that? Could it be that profits are our god? Could it be that no values larger than that shall ever prevail? Could it be that B'Obamush and the Republicrats actually reflect American values? In the 21st century we will have 9 billion humans, at least 4 degrees C higher temperatures, 21 foot higher seas, the release of methane gas from ocean and tundra. Will the first decade write the final chapter?
When will wisdom prevail and
Fri, 01/01/2010 - 23:41 — jborton (not verified)When will wisdom prevail and end the squandering? Capitalism creating profit for the few leads to greed. This type of profit is having catastrophic effects on millions of people and environments. Capitalism for the people creates better communities, schools, and health care, along with strong social networks, greener living, restoration of public lands, and making dreams come true. People who care must start making changes locally for freedom to work for all of us. The variety of color in the American populace diversifys the opinions and answers to choose from. This same diversification will soon be mainstream in cooporate america, but not soon enough for the "old stye greed" types from destorying much of the planet. Will the next decade lead the way - I doubt it, but I, like many others will keep trying.
There is little interest in
Fri, 01/01/2010 - 23:49 — Verbatim (not verified)There is little interest in America to even come close to understanding the squandered decade for what it was: the colossal screw up of every aspect of life touched by our leaders of the day.
Among them, " another essential argument over the meaning of the last decade: whether the proper response to the 9/11 attacks included not only the widely supported retaliation in Afghanistan but also the invasion of Iraq ", is in my opinion worthy of examination.
Yes, it should have been, and stayed, a retaliation in Afghanistan what America's proper response to the 9/11 attacks ought to have been. But above all, it should have been concluded, finished off before virtually giving Bin Laden and his criminal gang a free pass into Pakistan.
And yes again, "we have no choice but to reach a settlement about the meaning of the last 10 years." That failure in Afghanistan to capture the fugitive terrorists has defined the meaning of eight of the ten miserable years we are talking about. In every aspect of life.
Trouble is that we are stuck between leaders who screwed up and now only want to “move on” without taking time to ponder over what went wrong and why-- just trust us, close your eyes and take the next plunge-- respectively those who only want to keep on wallowing in recrimination over what went wrong and why, as they too waste the opportunity to learn anything from it.
WE HAVE NOT EVEN BEGUN TO
Sat, 01/02/2010 - 02:59 — MIKE (not verified)WE HAVE NOT EVEN BEGUN TO SEE HOW BAD THINGS ARE GOING TO GET. THE NEXT DECADE WILL BE SO MUCH WORSE THAN THE PREVIOUS. AMERICANS LIVE IN A CARNIVAL CULTURE. FANTASY HAS NOW TAKEN OVER REALITY. WE KEEP DESTROYING OUR HISTORY. AMERICA HAS NO HEROES, AND RELIGION DOESN'T KNOW THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN RIGHT OR WRONG. MY GRANDCHILDREN HAVE INHERITED A NIGHTMARE, AND IT ALL HAPPENED WHILE THEIR MENTORS WERE FAST ASLEEP. BLESSED ARE THE PEACE MAKERS, FOR THEY SHALL KNOW GOD.
We have elected a fool, and
Sat, 01/02/2010 - 03:21 — Food First (not verified)We have elected a fool, and we will pay the price. Just keep your eyes and ears open. May I suggest watching more than one news channel = if that is how you choose to form your opinions. This division is going to be the downfall of our country. What happened to the peace loving anti-establishment hippies - they are all voting for more government in their lives at every turn? I for one don't want to pay for someone else's health care - where does it end? What is the incentive to work if you are taken care of by the government? Green, self-sustainability does not come from big corporations like Monsanto who are poisioning our earth, patenting our seeds, and a president who wants farmer's markets and local foods to be labeled and monitored! We are allowing BIG PHARMA to preach to us on TV between every show on TV, millions of kids are sitting still in front of video games, getting fat- and we give them drugs to wonder why they are 'hyperactive" - no gym classes, no neighborhood playing, no outdoors. What the heck do you think it will be like here in 50 years when these kids are running things? Think forward, and not just for your own selves. We don't need any more "health care" we need to start to look at the root of the problem - malnutrition and crap being fed to our minds, bodies and the general population not even able to think straight - let alone make decisions that are based on fact, and not emotions. Lemmings. That is where we are headed....
If I may be pedantic, and we
Sat, 01/02/2010 - 03:37 — Anonymous (not verified)If I may be pedantic, and we have to do this every ten years. The decade is not ending, arbitrary as such a mark may be. But, the calendar we use is the calendar we have and so this is the final year of this decade. The decade began January 1, 2001 along with the century and the millenium.
The other comments on Mr.
Sat, 01/02/2010 - 04:22 — John David Baldwin (not verified)The other comments on Mr. Dionne's piece have rightly rejected his attempt to cast Barack Obama as a peacemaker and reformer. (Indeed, in addition to Bush's own two wars, thanks to Obama, we now have a third war... in Pakistan). We are in a period of systemic collapse, of total decadence and corruption, and Obama is neither inclined to nor capable to ending it. The only solution is to support a movement and a party that will put people over profit, that accepts no money from corporations, that is determined, unlike to two corporate, militarist parties to create a just, peaceful and sustainable world. That party is the Green Party.
Verbatim suggests that our
Sat, 01/02/2010 - 04:42 — Howard Christofersen, M. D. (not verified)Verbatim suggests that our leaders "now only want to "'move on'" without taking time to ponder over what went wrong and why."
Could it be that Osama attacked was, as he said, because we had military installations on what is considered ground holy to Islam? Is our world hegemony with 170 world wide military installations demonstrating our military might a cause for lesser nations to retaliate in the only way they are able? Terrorism is not an organized state with a fixed location that one can overcome by military might. It must be attacked at its core cause with honest diplomacy, understanding, fair trade policies and even aid.
As for Iraq, the given causes were all lies. There were no weapons of mass destruction. Osama was not welcome there. But there was oil and Bush, the oil man, wanted control. The 9/11 attack was all the excuse he needed.
The people of Afghanistan will not look kindly on us nor strive to become a democracy as long as we kill there natural leaders with drones that also kill many civilians each death producing more dedicated terrorists. So why are we there sacrificing our youth and our treasure? Oh, have you heard of the gas pipeline from Turkmenistan? What a prize that would be for the oil companies that had been planning it for some time before 9/11. At least one American company is involved in the planning. We need to get out now, challenge the Afghans to develop a stable government that can then contract to have the pipeline built and profit from the rental fees.
There is no easy or quick answer but if we continue "speaking softly" but no longer "carry a Big Stick"(Monroe Doctrine) terror attacks will decrease.
I am a hippy, I was a hippy
Sat, 01/02/2010 - 05:26 — Ken Hall (not verified)I am a hippy, I was a hippy in the 60's and I am still living an alternataive lifestyle, and I can say with some authenticity that hippies were not anti-establishment so much as anti-"corporate-enabling-warmongering"-establishment. Look, wherever you live on the face of the earth, you're going to live under some kind of government and pay taxes, the important thing to ask is "Where does my tax money go?" Big government in itself is not bad, government unresponsive to democratic pressure is. Segments of the US populace reject any government, which is such a foolish idea that I won't even address it. I for one would rather have my tax dollars go to healthcare and childcare and education than to bombs and wars. The incentive to work and be creative is a personal imperative and doesn't come from or nor can it be discouraged by government programs. The current mess is the logical end of the Reagan revolution of a bigger military budget, extravagant tax cuts, and smaller government (but only of the regulatory kind). Many people were taken in by his snakeoil medicine doctor spiel but I wasn't one of them.
An article in TruthOut ,
Sat, 01/02/2010 - 05:35 — Howard Christofersen, M. D. (not verified)An article in TruthOut , Jan. 1,by E.J. Dionne Jr. , Fighting Over the Squandered Decade, was criticized by Verbatim(his pseudo name) suggesting that our leaders "now only want to "'move on'" without taking time to ponder over what went wrong and why."
  Could it be that Osama attacked, as he said, because we had military installations on what is considered ground holy to Islam? Is our world hegemony with 170 world wide military installations demonstrating our military might a cause for lesser nations to retaliate in the only way they are able? Terrorism is not an organized state with a fixed location that one can overcome by military might. It must be attacked at its core cause with honest diplomacy, understanding, fair trade policies and even aid.
  As for Iraq, the given causes were all lies. There were no weapons of mass destruction. Osama was not welcome there. But there was oil and Bush, the oil man, wanted control. The 9/11 attack was all the excuse he needed.Â
The people of Afghanistan will not look kindly on us nor strive to become a democracy as long as we kill there natural leaders with drones that also kill many civilians each death producing more dedicated terrorists. So why are we there sacrificing our  youth and our treasure? Oh, have you heard  of the gas pipeline from Turkmenistan? What a prize that would be for the oil companies that had been planning it for some time before 9/11. At least one American company is involved in the planning. We need to get out now, challenge the Afghans to develop a stable government that can then contract to have the pipeline built and profit from the rental fees.
There is no easy or quick answer but if we continue "speaking softly" but no longer "carry a Big Stick"(Monroe Doctrine) and give strong support to the United Nations terror attacks will decrease.
"...Big government in itself
Sat, 01/02/2010 - 16:08 — Anonymous (not verified)"...Big government in itself is not bad, government unresponsive to democratic pressure is..." - hippy.
And the US government is now of the Corporations, by the Corporations and FOR the Corporations. Let us hope it shall perish from this earth
Mr. Howard Christofersen,
Sat, 01/02/2010 - 19:56 — Anonymous (not verified)Mr. Howard Christofersen, M.D.
Verbatim neither suggested nor criticized.
He simply stated that a) There is little interest in America to understand the squandered decade for what it was; and b) That we are stuck between those who want "to move on" and those who recriminate, both categories being made up of leaders who seem not interested to find out what went wrong and why. In a nutshell our problem is failed leadership. But since we put the leaders in power, it is our failure too. We are too busy with toeing our divisive party lines when we ought to look at facts and see the truth.
Anon @ 16:08; Yes, we live
Sun, 01/03/2010 - 07:16 — Ken Hall (not verified)Anon @ 16:08; Yes, we live in a fascist state, what are you doing to change it? The Hippy slogan was "turn on, tune in, drop out". In every way I am able I withhold any support for corporatocracy and try to empower my local community and people-centered organizations/programs, national and international. We aren't going to get anywhere by wishing and hoping, or by giving up.
The writer is correct in his
Sun, 01/03/2010 - 20:01 — morgan1 (not verified)The writer is correct in his assessment of the last decade; however, he is wrong about the next one. This year has ended on the same note as Bush was leaving office in disgrace--Whether he admits it or not. Obama filled his Administration with all those who brought about the financial meltdown--This is not news or even new. The next decade will be far worse as the really bad guys control all aspects of our lives and our government. This is not taking back our govt.; nor is it turning away from the Reaganites determination to seize control of the WH and run out country into the ground and make all of us frightened rabbit slaves.
There will be more war, more corruption, less rights and freedoms for all of us except the very top one per centers who will be fat on their gluttony. It will be a one country bank (BofA), Wal Mart will be the only store in the land (All others crushed), all voting will be electronic but no one will have to bother with long lines for it will be done from the safety and comfort of their own home over the net (The winner posted immediately as polls close),the prison population will not double as predicted for voluntary suicide will be the wave (Whether they wanted it or not)...What a lovely decade we are being marched into.
That was a fantastic decade.
Mon, 01/04/2010 - 17:27 — Steven Travis (not verified)That was a fantastic decade. Atrocity certainly didn't start in 2000. We have just witnessed the collapse of the American system, federal currency, the military complex, the IRS sham, religious insanity, the myth of Presidency. The fact that it is still here as a grossly inflated carcass obscures its demise to some until the mess is swept up. How could it happen otherwise?
We also witnessed the absolute truth of the value of natural energies, planetary mind, ecstatic awakening, true compassion, the shedding of the anti-wealth mentality of federal reserve notes. Corporations buying debt for security, madly trading derivatives, the dollar backed by debt. How great is that? Even the sham of solving "global warming" by massive carbon taxation and universal regulation of every breath we take.
Bre'r Rabbit begged Bre'r Fox "PLEASE don't throw me into the Brier Patch!" His home.
Remember when 7 armed nuclear missiles left one airbase on the wings of a bomber, and five arrived at the next base? I noticed Dick Cheney was 66.6 years old at that moment. Appropriate birthday gift.
We are doing alright. The world is shimmering with love. Happy 2012. We are on the toboggan run.